Regulatory and Supervisory Modernisation Principles: Consultation report
AI Analysis
The FSB published a consultation report on 14 October 2026 proposing eight high-level principles to help authorities modernise regulatory and supervisory frameworks while preserving or enhancing financial-system resilience. The report is not a binding rule for firms, but it signals potential future changes involving proportionality, risk prioritisation, impact analysis, supervisory technology, regulatory coherence and adaptation to new technologies and business models; independent commentary frames the initiative as a move toward more targeted, risk-based oversight and reduced burden, particularly for less complex institutions.
Key dates
- 2026-10-14
- FSB published the consultation report proposing eight high-level regulatory and supervisory modernisation principles.
- 2027-01-08 Deadline
- Deadline for submitting responses to the FSB consultation through the secure online form.
- 2027-01-01
- FSB expects to publish the final report in the first half of 2027; the exact publication date is not specified.
Suggested considerations
- Compliance teams may wish to monitor the consultation and identify whether proposed approaches to proportionality, tailoring, materiality and impact analysis could affect the firm’s prudential, supervisory or reporting perimeter.
- Firms should consider preparing evidence-based comments or case studies, directly or through trade associations, on regulatory duplication, cliff effects, implementation costs, resilience outcomes and the consequences of applying complex-institution requirements to simpler business models.
- Regulatory affairs teams may wish to map current and planned consultations by home and host authorities against the FSB themes, particularly risk-based supervision, technology-enabled supervision, responsible innovation and framework coherence.
- Prudential and risk functions may wish to assess whether current data can demonstrate the firm’s size, complexity, systemic relevance, business-model risks and resilience if authorities introduce more differentiated requirements.
- Firms should not treat the consultation as permission to reduce existing controls or as a change to applicable law; existing internationally agreed standards and jurisdiction-specific requirements remain in force unless separately amended.
- Stakeholder-relations teams may wish to review communications about any future tailoring proposals so that efficiency measures are not characterised as reducing resilience or supervisory safeguards.
What changed
The FSB has proposed eight principles addressed to financial authorities rather than directly applicable obligations for regulated firms. The principles seek to improve the effectiveness, efficiency, risk focus, coherence and forward-looking nature of regulatory and supervisory frameworks, while remaining consistent with internationally agreed standards, national legal frameworks and jurisdiction-specific circumstances. The consultation specifically invites views on materiality-based risk prioritisation, proportionality and tailoring, management of cliff effects, impact-analysis assumptions and limitations, communication of modernisation efforts, predictable implementation, and the effects on market participants. No capital, liquidity, reporting, governance or other firm-level requirement
Compliance impact
Immediate legal and operational impact is low because the report is consultative and imposes no direct obligations or thresholds on firms. Strategic impact is potentially material over time: authorities may use the final principles to redesign supervisory frameworks, tailor requirements by risk and complexity, remove unnecessary duplication, update thresholds, and alter reporting or supervisory pr
Who is affected
Related regulations
References
AI-generated analysis. May contain errors or omissions — verify with the original FSB source before acting. Full disclaimer.
What the FSB said
As FSB members review their regulatory and supervisory frameworks, the proposed principles should contribute to efforts to keep such frameworks effective and efficient.
Published by FSB . Read the full notice at the source for the authoritative text.