Large-Bank Deposit Insurance Determination Modernization
AI Analysis
The FDIC proposed rescinding 12 CFR part 370 and shifting institutions currently subject to that rule into an amended 12 CFR 360.9 framework. The proposal would remove the obligation for the largest insured depository institutions to build and maintain their own deposit-insurance calculation systems, while preserving standardized data, provisional-hold, recordkeeping, and depositor-notification capabilities needed for prompt FDIC determinations.
Key dates
- 2026-11-04
- The proposed rule was published in the Federal Register at 91 FR 69642.
- 2027-01-04 Deadline
- Comments on RIN 3064-AG35 must be received by the FDIC.
- 2029-10-01
- First proposed inflation-based adjustment to the section 360.9 covered-institution and larger-covered-institution thresholds.
Suggested considerations
- Affected banks should assess whether they meet the proposed covered-institution or larger-covered-institution thresholds using Call Report definitions and current deposit-account and asset data.
- Current part 370 institutions should map existing output files and deposit-account records against the 26 proposed mandatory fields in 12 CFR part 360 appendices C through G, identifying gaps in account title, ownership, relationship, beneficiary, domestic-versus-foreign, and other required data.
- Part 370 institutions should evaluate the effect of replacing their own deposit-insurance calculation systems with FDIC-calculation reliance, while preserving or redeveloping the provisional-hold capabilities required by proposed section 360.9.
- Larger covered institutions should inventory transactional accounts subject to the proposed account-holder contractual or disclosure requirement and determine which mortgage-servicer, fiduciary, real-estate, IOLTA, employee-benefit-plan, and trust-related accounts may be excluded.
- Compliance, operations, legal, and technology teams should review the proposed six-month implementation period for general requirements and 18-month period for provisional-hold requirements for institutions that are larger covered institutions on the final rule's effective date.
- Banks approaching the thresholds should establish monitoring for two consecutive quarters, the proposed 12-month implementation period after becoming a larger covered institution, and the proposed release mechanism after three consecutive quarters below the relevant threshold.
- Institutions should consider whether to submit comments by January 4, 2027, particularly on field-level data requirements, provisional-hold redevelopment, account-holder disclosures, transition timing, exemptions, and the CPI-W indexing methodology.
- Industry commentary indicates that the proposal is being read primarily as a burden-reduction measure for large banks, with estimated annual savings of approximately $33 million offset by approximately $14 million in transition costs; firms should nevertheless account for operational work associated with standardized data and provisional holds.
What changed
Proposed revised 12 CFR 360.9 would apply to insured depository institutions with at least $2 billion in deposits and either at least 250,000 deposit accounts or at least $20 billion in total assets, regardless of deposit-account count. A new category of larger covered institution would include institutions with at least $2 billion in deposits and two million or more deposit accounts. Part 370 institutions would generally become larger covered institutions under section 360.9, and would no longer need to operate systems capable of calculating deposit-insurance coverage themselves. Larger covered institutions would have to populate 26 mandatory data fields in the standardized formats in appendices C through G of 12 CFR part 360, including deposit type, account-level customer ownership, acco
Compliance impact
The proposal would materially reduce the technology and ongoing recordkeeping burden for current part 370 institutions, but it would preserve significant resolution-readiness obligations involving standardized data, provisional holds, and customer communications. The FDIC estimates 148 affected IDIs, approximately $14 million in aggregate transition costs, approximately $33 million in annual savin
Who is affected
Related regulations
References
AI-generated analysis. May contain errors or omissions — verify with the original FDIC source before acting. Full disclaimer.
What the FDIC said
Notice of proposed rulemaking and request for comment. The FDIC is seeking comment on a proposal that would: remove the regulation regarding recordkeeping for timely deposit insurance determination; revise the regulation regarding large-bank deposit insurance determination modernization to modify the requirements…
Extract from FDIC . Read the full notice at the source for the authoritative text.