Live Updates

Bank of England sets out approach to tokenised collateral in central clearing

AI Analysis

The Bank of England published a consultation on draft supervisory expectations for UK CCPs seeking to accept tokenised versions of collateral already eligible under the proposed UK CCP Rulebook. The proposal does not create a separate tokenised-collateral regime or expand the eligible-asset list; instead, it clarifies how existing approval, collateral-risk, custody, operational-resilience and governance requirements would apply to tokenised arrangements, subject to responses by 2027-02-12.

Key dates

2026-10-29
The Bank of England published the consultation and draft Supervisory Statement on CCP acceptance of tokenised collateral.
2027-02-12 Deadline
Consultation closes; responses on the draft supervisory expectations and wider tokenised-collateral policy are requested by this date.
2028-01-01
Target year for the Bank’s planned RT2 synchronisation capability supporting settlement between digital-asset ledgers and central bank money; this is a stated implementation target, not a compliance deadline.

Suggested considerations

  • CCPs and prospective CCP applicants should consider whether tokenised versions of currently accepted or eligible collateral would constitute new collateral requiring notification to, or permission from, the Bank under the existing supervisory and margin-permission processes.
  • Compliance, legal and risk teams should consider mapping each proposed tokenised collateral arrangement end to end, including issuance, representation of rights, custody, transfer, settlement finality, redemption, liquidation and default management.
  • CCPs should consider preparing evidence on valuation methodology, price reliability, liquidity, conversion between tokenised and conventional forms, repo or outright-sale access, stress-market behaviour and concentration treatment across identical underlying assets.
  • CCPs and their service providers should consider legal opinions addressing ownership, enforceability, insolvency treatment, settlement finality under the Settlement Finality Regulations, transfer restrictions and the relationship between ledger records, CSD records and underlying assets.
  • Operational-resilience assessments should consider ledger, bridge, smart-contract, custodian, wallet, key-management and other third-party failure scenarios, including alternative access, transfer, liquidation and recovery arrangements.
  • CCPs should consider whether proposed arrangements require changes to models, parameters, margining, collateral haircuts, default-management procedures, investment-policy controls, outsourcing oversight or governance approvals.
  • Affected firms and infrastructure providers may wish to submit responses to the Bank’s consultation by 2027-02-12, particularly on practical barriers, wider tokenised-asset use cases and whether the proposed expectations remain suitable for future collateral types.
  • Firms operating cross-border collateral arrangements should consider the interaction with parallel international developments, including ESMA’s October 2026 call for evidence on tokenised collateral in EU central clearing.

What changed

The Bank proposes to assess tokenised collateral through the existing supervisory process for new collateral, including where a tokenised version has risk characteristics that differ from the approved non-tokenised asset because of its delivery method, credit risk or liquidity profile. The draft Supervisory Statement adopts a technology-neutral, outcomes-focused and proportionate approach: CCPs would need to demonstrate that tokenised collateral can be valued, transferred, controlled and realised within required timeframes in normal and stressed conditions. Relevant assessments include liquidity and near-real-time valuation, market depth and price formation, additional issuer or intermediary credit risk, concentration across tokenised and non-tokenised representations of the same exposure,

Compliance impact

The consultation does not impose immediate new binding obligations, but it is a significant supervisory signal that tokenisation will be assessed within existing CCP risk-management and approval frameworks rather than treated as inherently prohibited. Practical compliance impact is potentially high for CCPs and their members pursuing tokenised collateral because approval may depend on demonstrable

Who is affected

  • UK-authorised central counterparties
  • Recognised non-UK central counterparties that are, or are likely to become, systemically important to UK financial stability
  • Entities planning to apply for recognition as a UK central counterparty under section 290 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000
  • Clearing members and market participants posting collateral to affected CCPs
  • Digital securities depositories, custodians, tokenisers, wallet providers and other technology or infrastructure providers supporting tokenised collateral arrangements
  • UK CCP Rulebook
  • UK European Market Infrastructure Regulation (UK EMIR)
  • Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, section 290
  • Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, section 138BA
  • Settlement Finality Regulations
  • Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures

AI-generated analysis. May contain errors or omissions — verify with the original BoE source before acting. Full disclaimer.

What the BoE said

The Bank of England has today launched a consultation supporting central counterparties (CCPs) acceptance of tokenised forms of eligible collateral.

Published by BoE . Read the full notice at the source for the authoritative text.

View Original on BoE Back to Feed

Share this update