The document is a calendar of SSM (Single Supervisory Mechanism) events for June 2026, published by CSSF (Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier). It contains only a title, publication date, and links to related monthly calendar documents.
The document is a calendar of SSM (Single Supervisory Mechanism) meetings for Claude Wampach, published by CSSF (Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier). It contains only a title, publication date, and links to PDF calendars for various months/years.
The document is a calendar of SSM (Single Supervisory Mechanism) meetings for Claude Wampach for April 2026, published by CSSF. It contains only a title, publication date, and links to related monthly calendar PDFs with no actual regulatory guidance, rules, enforcement actions, or policy content.
This is an informational notification letter from CSSF regarding the UCITS Directive framework for management companies seeking to pursue authorized activities in other EU Member States. It provides a template form for cross-border notification under Articles 17(2) and 18(1) of Directive 2009/65/EC.
ESMA Common Supervisory Action targeting UCITS Management Companies and Alternative Investment Fund Managers on risk management function effectiveness. Focuses on governance, risk identification/measurement/monitoring, and reporting requirements.
This is an informational notification about a public register of the audit profession maintained by CSSF (Luxembourg financial regulator). It primarily concerns regulatory transparency and professional registration rather than substantive regulatory requirements.
Content references algorithmic trading notification template from CSSF (Luxembourg financial regulator). Primary focus is on market abuse surveillance and reporting requirements for algorithmic trading activities.
This is an informational notification about a DPE (Designated Person for Enforcement) notification template and public register of the audit profession maintained by CSSF (Luxembourg financial regulator).
This is a notification template for Systematic Internalisers under MiFID II, issued by Luxembourg's financial regulator (CSSF). It relates to capital markets disclosure and regulatory reporting requirements. The content appears to be informational/procedural guidance rather than urgent regulatory change.
This is a notification regarding commodity derivative registration in the CSSF public register of the audit profession. It appears to be informational content about regulatory disclosure/reporting requirements for commodity derivatives.
Article 7b EMIR reporting requirement for active accounts is a regulatory disclosure obligation affecting derivatives market participants. The CSSF source indicates Luxembourg regulatory guidance. Content appears to be informational/procedural rather than announcing new requirements, hence null urgency.
This is an informational update about the CSSF's public register of the audit profession. It primarily concerns regulatory registration and disclosure requirements applicable to audit firms operating in Luxembourg's financial sector.
This is an informational press release from CSSF regarding mandatory sell-out proceedings for Kernel Holding S.A. shares. It announces the fair price determination (PLN 19.93/share) following squeeze-out/sell-out law procedures.
This is an informational announcement about a public register of the audit profession maintained by CSSF (Luxembourg's financial regulator). It contains cookie policy and website navigation information rather than substantive regulatory requirements.
This is an informational announcement about the public register of the audit profession maintained by CSSF (Luxembourg financial regulator). It relates to regulatory reporting requirements and professional licensing/authorization.
This is an informational announcement about a public register of the audit profession maintained by CSSF (Luxembourg financial regulator). It relates to audit firm licensing/authorization and is primarily procedural/administrative in nature.
1) high-risk jurisdictions on which enhanced due diligence and, where appropriate, counter-measures are imposed2) jurisdictions under increased monitoring of the FATFVersion of 19 June 2026
AI Analysis
CSSF published a new **Annex to Circular CSSF 22/822** on **22 June 2026**, updating the Luxembourg regulator’s reference list of FATF **high-risk jurisdictions** and **jurisdictions under increased monitoring**. For compliance teams, this matters because AML/CFT country-risk scoring, enhanced due diligence triggers, and sanctions-style controls must be aligned to the current FATF position reflected by CSSF.
Key dates
27 October 2022
- Circular CSSF 22/822 was issued, establishing the framework for using FATF statements on high-risk jurisdictions and jurisdictions under increased monitoring
19 June 2026
- The annex was updated to this version date, reflecting the current FATF jurisdiction lists and associated risk posture
22 June 2026
- CSSF published the annex on its website, making the updated reference document operationally relevant for supervised firms
Suggested considerations
Review your AML/CFT country-risk methodology and update it to reflect the 19 June 2026 FATF/CSSF jurisdiction list.
Re-screen customers, beneficial owners, counterparties, and transactions against the updated high-risk and monitored jurisdiction lists.
Apply enhanced due diligence for relationships and transactions involving high-risk jurisdictions, and escalate where counter-measures may be required.
Reassess risk ratings for customers linked to jurisdictions under increased monitoring and document the rationale for any continued onboarding, retention, or exit decisions.
Update automated screening rules, transaction-monitoring scenarios, and onboarding checklists so they use the current CSSF annex version.
What changed
- CSSF republished the annex to Circular CSSF 22/822 in a Version of 19 June 2026, meaning firms should treat this as the current Luxembourg reference point for FATF jurisdiction screening and...
The annex distinguishes between high-risk jurisdictions subject to enhanced due diligence and, where appropriate, counter-measures, and jurisdictions under increased monitoring that require...
The publication incorporates the FATF’s current statements on jurisdictions with strategic AML/CFT/CPF deficiencies, which is the basis for operational country-risk controls used by...
The related Circular CSSF 22/822 remains the framework document that instructs professionals to use FATF statements when assessing jurisdictional ML/TF/PF risk.
Compliance impact
Non-compliance can lead to supervisory findings, remediation orders, and possible enforcement action where firms fail to apply risk-sensitive AML controls consistent with CSSF/FATF expectations. The practical impact is highest for onboarding, correspondent-like relationships, cross-border payments, and any business line exposed to higher-risk jurisdictions.
The CSSF has introduced two **mandatory standardised application forms** for authorisation of UCITS **domestic mergers** under the Luxembourg Law of 17 December 2010 and **outbound cross‑border mergers** where the receiving UCITS is located in another EU Member State under Directive 2009/65/EC. From 19 June 2026, any new UCITS merger authorisation request of these types must use the new forms and be filed by email with the full supporting documentation required by the applicable UCITS merger provisions.
Key dates
19 June 2026
- CSSF communiqué published announcing the two new merger authorisation forms for UCITS domestic mergers and UCITS outbound cross‑border mergers
19 June 2026 Deadline
- **Start of mandatory use of the new forms** for all **new merger authorisation applications** filed with the CSSF; applications submitted from this date must use the new templates and be sent to [email protected]
Suggested considerations
Identify all current and planned UCITS domestic and outbound cross‑border merger projects and determine which will have CSSF authorisation requests submitted on or after 19 June 2026 so that the new forms are used.
Download and review in detail the “Application form for authorisation of a UCITS domestic merger” and “Application form for authorisation of a UCITS outbound cross‑border merger” and map each field of the forms to existing internal data sources and documents.
Update internal UCITS merger procedures and checklists to replace any existing CSSF filing templates with the new standardised forms and to include the requirement that all merger authorisation applications are submitted to [email protected].
Train legal, product, operations and compliance staff involved in UCITS mergers on how to complete the new forms accurately, including coordination of information across the prospectus, KIIDs/KIDs, common draft merger terms, depositary statements and shareholder communications.
Review and, where necessary, update board and governance templates (board minutes, resolutions approving merger terms) to ensure they produce all information that the new forms require to be confirmed or attached.
What changed
- The CSSF has created a standardised “Application form for authorisation of a UCITS domestic merger” specifically for merger authorisation requests where both merging and receiving UCITS are...
The CSSF has created a standardised “Application form for authorisation of a UCITS outbound cross‑border merger” for mergers where the merging UCITS is Luxembourg‑authorised and the receiving UCITS...
Use of the two new forms is mandatory for all new merger authorisation applications submitted to the CSSF from 19 June 2026 onwards; legacy formats (ad‑hoc letters or bespoke templates) may no longer...
Each application form must be “duly completed” and accompanied by all documents required under the applicable UCITS merger regulations, including the common draft terms of merger, updated prospectus...
The CSSF has specified a centralised submission channel for these applications: completed forms and supporting documentation must be sent to [email protected], aligning merger filings with the...
Compliance impact
Non‑compliance (e.g. using outdated templates or submitting incomplete forms) is likely to result in the CSSF treating the file as inadmissible or incomplete, delaying merger authorisation and potentially requiring postponement of planned merger effective dates. Repeated deficiencies or failure to comply with the standardised process may also raise supervisory concerns about the firm’s governance and regulatory controls around UCITS product actions.
This is an SSM (Single Supervisory Mechanism) calendar publication from CSSF (Luxembourg financial regulator) listing scheduled supervisory activities and events. It is informational/administrative in nature, providing transparency on regulatory calendar items rather than announcing new rules or requirements.
MiCAR STORs (Suspicious Transaction and Order Reports) under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation is a regulatory framework requirement for reporting suspicious activities. This is informational content from CSSF (Luxembourg financial regulator) about a public register related to audit profession oversight.
This is an informational notice about scheduled technical maintenance of eDesk (CSSF's electronic desk system). It affects operational continuity and is relevant to all regulated firms using the platform.
CSSF publishes mandatory list of independent approved statutory auditors and audit firms meeting EU Regulation 537/2014 Article 16 criteria (receiving <15% audit fees from PIEs).
This regulatory update provides information on the members of the Resolution Board, which is relevant for banks, wealth managers, and asset managers subject to prudential requirements, reporting obligations, and authorization procedures.
This regulatory update provides a list of members of the CPDI, which is relevant for firms in the banking, investment management, and wealth management sectors. The topics covered include AML/financial crime, consumer protection, and authorization/licensing, which are important for these types of firms.
This regulatory update provides information on the members of the Investment Fund Managers Committee, which is relevant for investment management and wealth management firms. It also touches on topics related to authorization, prudential requirements, and governance, which are important for these types of firms.
This regulatory update from the CSSF in Luxembourg is relevant for investment management firms domiciled in Luxembourg. It provides information on the procedures for management notifications and de-notifications when using the European passport, which is an important authorization and licensing requirement for these...
This regulatory update from the CSSF provides information on a notification form for updating payment institutions and electronic money institutions' information, which is relevant for payment providers.
This regulatory update from the CSSF in Luxembourg relates to the public register of the audit profession, which is relevant for banking, investment management, and wealth management firms operating in Luxembourg. The key topics covered are reporting, authorization, and governance requirements.
This regulatory update from the CSSF relates to disruptions on the eDesk platform, which is likely a critical operational system for financial firms. The impact could be widespread across banking, investment management, and wealth management firms, as well as fintechs that rely on the eDesk platform.
This regulatory update from the CSSF relates to a new reporting template for GBP LDI funds, which is relevant for investment managers and wealth managers that operate such funds. The update involves new disclosure and prudential requirements, hence the classification.
This regulatory update from the CSSF in Luxembourg is relevant for banks and wealth managers that are involved in the issuance of covered bonds ('lettres de gage').
1) high-risk jurisdictions on which enhanced due diligence and, where appropriate, counter-measures are imposed2) jurisdictions under increased monitoring of the FATFVersion of 17 February 2026
AI Analysis
The Annex of Circular CSSF 22/822 (Version of 17 February 2026) is Luxembourg's Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier's implementation guidance on FATF (Financial Action Task Force) designations of high-risk jurisdictions requiring enhanced due diligence and counter-measures, as well as jurisdictions under increased monitoring. This document is critical for Luxembourg-regulated financial institutions because it operationalizes international AML/CFT standards into binding compliance obligations, directly impacting customer acceptance, transaction monitoring, and correspondent banking relationships.
Key dates
27 October 2022
- Original Circular CSSF 22/822 issued
27 October 2025
- Previous version superseded
17 February 2026
- Current version effective (Annex of Circular CSSF 22/822)
Apply enhanced due diligence and monitoring measures to business relationships and transactions with designated jurisdictions
Increase the frequency and timing of transaction controls
Select transaction patterns requiring further examination and obtain detailed information on transaction purposes
Maintain enhanced mechanisms for reporting suspicious activity to the FIU
What changed
The current version (17 February 2026) represents the most recent update to the CSSF's FATF-aligned jurisdiction risk framework. Based on the available search results, the document establishes two primary regulatory categories:
High-Risk Jurisdictions (Category 1): Jurisdictions designated by FATF as having strategic deficiencies in their AML/CFT regimes, requiring enhanced due diligence and, where appropriate, counter-measures.
This regulatory update is relevant for third-country branches of credit institutions, as it sets a new submission timeframe for a register of information required under DORA. This impacts banking and payments firms operating in the EU.
For which the CSSF is the relevant competent authority under Regulation (EU) No 236/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2012 on short selling and certain aspects of credit default swaps
Why this matters
This regulatory update from the CSSF provides a list of issuers of shares and sovereign debt for which the CSSF is the competent authority under the EU short selling regulation. This is informational content relevant for banks, broker-dealers, and asset managers operating in capital markets and investment management.
This regulatory update provides a list of investment funds (UCIs and SIFs) that have a sharia-compliant policy, which is relevant for investment management and wealth management firms.
Submission of the register of information at individual or consolidated level to the CSSF (excluding entities under the direct supervision of the ECB)
Why this matters
This regulatory update from the CSSF provides details on the submission timeframe and process for the DORA register of information, which is relevant for banking, investment management, and wealth management firms. It covers operational resilience, reporting, and technology/cyber topics.
This CSSF communiqué announces the availability of updated UCI Reports (SAQ, SR, and ML) under Circular CSSF 21/790 on the eDesk platform's CISERO module for specific 2026 year-ends, with key enhancements focused on valuation, NAV determination, and risk-based streamlining. It matters for Luxembourg UCIs as it reflects evolving supervisory priorities, aligns with EU directives like Directive (EU) 2024/927, and imposes refined self-assessment obligations to bolster resilience in stressed conditions and liquidity management.
Key dates
9 February 2026
Reports (SAQ, SR, ML) made available on eDesk CISERO for year-ends 31 January, 28 February, 31 March, 30 April 2026
16 April 2026
Entry into application of AIFM/UCITS Review Directive LMT requirements
Financial year Deadline
end +5 months (UCITS/Part II UCIs); SAQ/SR submission deadline
Financial year Deadline
end +6 months (SIFs/SICARs); SAQ/SR submission deadline
Three months before year
end (post-30 April 2026); Future Reports availability
Suggested considerations
Access updated Reports on eDesk CISERO module immediately and review changes vs. 31 December 2025 versions.
Update valuation policies/procedures to explicitly cover stressed conditions, new sub-funds/strategies, model validations, and backtesting; document compliance.
Revise NAV processes for LMT alignment with Directive (EU) 2024/927 Annexes and ESMA performance fee guidelines; confirm for open-ended UCIs.
Dirigeants/management: Complete/validate SAQ addressing new/clarified questions; prepare for REA SR/ML review.
REAs: Perform streamlined SR procedures; issue ML on prior weaknesses with remediation timelines.
What changed
- SAQ Updates (Valuation Section): New questions on valuation policies for stressed market conditions/exceptional circumstances; coverage for new sub-funds/strategies; independent validation of...
SAQ Simplifications and Clarifications: Removed questions on sub-funds with significant non-standard OTC derivatives, unquoted assets, or external valuer OTC FDIs (including NAV proportions); refined...
SAQ NAV Determination: Updated Liquidity Management Tools (LMTs) sub-section to align with Annexes of AIFM/UCITS Review Directive (Directive (EU) 2024/927); added question on compliance with ESMA...
SR Streamlining: Removed procedures in investment compliance (e.g., eligibility assessments for closed-ended funds, structured instruments, non-plain vanilla OTC derivatives; credit quality for money...
Reports for year-ends after 30 April 2026 available three months prior.
Compliance impact
Urgency: High – Immediate access required for imminent submissions (e.g., 31 January 2026 year-end due ~June 2026); new valuation questions demand policy reviews to avoid supervisory findings, especially amid stressed markets; SR simplifications reduce burden but shift focus to SAQ self-assessment, heightening dirigeants' accountability. Non-compliance risks CSSF follow-up on modified audits or weaknesses, per Circular 21/790.
This regulatory update is related to the annual PSD2 ICT assessment reporting requirement for payment service providers (PSPs) in Luxembourg. It provides details on the submission process and timeline, which is of medium importance for the affected firms.
This regulatory update is related to the list of fund units subject to the European Social Entrepreneurship Funds (EuSEF) regulation, which is relevant for investment management and wealth management firms that offer or invest in such funds.
This regulatory update provides a list of fund units subject to the European Long-Term Investment Funds (ELTIFs) regulation, which is relevant for investment management and wealth management firms that offer or manage such funds.
This is an update to a regulatory form related to the notification and change of particulars for tied agents, which is relevant for investment management and wealth management firms.
This regulatory update provides information on a registration form for meetings with UCI Departments of the CSSF, which is relevant for financial firms in the banking, investment management, and wealth management sectors.
This is an informational update on the members of the Consultative Committee for Prudential Regulation, which is relevant for banks, asset managers, and wealth managers from a prudential, operational resilience, and authorization perspective.
This regulatory update announces the updated list of members of the Consultative Committee for the Audit Profession, which is relevant for banking, investment management, and wealth management firms that are subject to audit requirements.
This is an informational update on the members of the Capital Markets Committee, which is relevant for banking and capital markets firms. The update covers governance and authorization aspects.
This regulatory update provides information on the list of members of the Board, which is relevant for banking, investment management, and wealth management firms that are subject to oversight by the CSSF.
This regulatory update provides information on the updated list of members of the Executive Board, which is relevant for banking, investment management, and wealth management firms that operate in Luxembourg and are subject to CSSF oversight.
This regulatory update from the CSSF relates to a product intervention measure taken by the German regulator BaFin regarding turbo certificates. It impacts the marketing, distribution and sale of these products to retail clients in Germany, which is relevant for banking, investment management and capital markets firms...
This regulatory update from the CSSF deactivates certain validation rules and EBA small validation packages for COFREP reporting, which is relevant for banks, asset managers, and wealth managers in the banking and investment management sectors. The update is informational in nature, so the urgency is low.
This regulatory update relates to the registration of EU/EEA mortgage credit intermediaries operating in Luxembourg under the freedom to provide services, which is relevant for banking, credit, and mortgage lending firms.
This CSSF publication, dated January 12, 2026, identifies the specific population (likely a firm or individual) subject to an enforcement action, such as an administrative sanction, as part of the CSSF's transparency in supervisory measures. It matters because it signals CSSF's active enforcement priorities, potentially in areas like AML or reporting failures, enabling firms to assess similar risks in their operations and strengthen compliance to avoid parallel actions. Published amid rising focus on financial crime typologies like sexual extortion, it underscores the regulator's commitment to public accountability.
Suggested considerations
For the named population: Comply with any sanction terms (e.g., pay fines, implement remediation plans, or cease certain activities), and report to CSSF as required; appeal if applicable under Luxembourg administrative law.
Update internal policies, train staff on enforcement precedents, and ensure robust reporting under Circular CSSF 19/726 or Transparency Law obligations.
What changed
No new regulatory changes or requirements are introduced in this publication, as it is an enforcement notice rather than a circular or guideline. It serves as a disclosure of an ongoing or concluded enforcement case, aligning with CSSF's practice of publishing sanction details to deter non-compliance and inform the market, without altering existing rules.
Compliance impact
Urgency: High – Immediate relevance for the named party facing direct consequences; medium-to-high for peers due to CSSF's pattern of public enforcements signaling heightened scrutiny on financial crime, especially amid rising OCSE/FSEC cases noted in recent CSSF guidance. It matters as it could preview broader supervisory sweeps, impacting reputation, operations, and costs if similar vulnerabilities exist.
Single Resolution Fund – Information request by the Single Resolution Board for the calculation of the 2026 contribution according to Articles 4 and 14 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF-CODERES 25/21, issued by the CSSF on 29 September 2025, mandates Luxembourg credit institutions to submit specific data via XBRL-formatted Data Reporting Forms (DRFs) to enable the Single Resolution Board (SRB) to calculate 2026 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRF) under Articles 4 and 14 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63. This matters because non-compliance risks SRB using estimates, applying the highest risk multiplier, or penalties, ensuring the financial sector funds resolution costs without taxpayer burden.
Key dates
30 November 2025 Deadline
- SRB decision deadline on whether to calculate/collect 2026 SRF contributions based on DRFs (triggers full additional assurance application)
15 January 2026
- ECB-supervised institutions submit AUP or auditor reports on restatements to CSSF resolution department
16 January 2026, 24:00 CET
- All institutions submit completed DRF in XBRL to CSSF; late/incomplete submissions lead to SRB estimates or highest risk multiplier
Suggested considerations
Download and complete DRF using Annexes (e.g., Annex 3a PDF, Annex 5 User Guide v1.4); submit in XBRL format by deadline.
For ECB-supervised institutions: Provide additional assurances per Annex 7a/7b if SRB proceeds with collections; prepare restatement AUPs with auditor exceptions where applicable.
Align internal systems with CSSF templates early; validate data to avoid SRB assumptions under Article 17(1) DR.
- Introduces data collection for 2026 SRF contributions, conditional on SRB verifying SRF funds fall below 1% of covered deposits in the Banking Union by early 2026.
Mandates XBRL submission of DRFs (except restatements up to 2022 in Excel); provides templates in Annexes 3a, 4, 5 (User Guide), and 7a/7b for additional assurances.
Additional assurance requirements (e.g., auditor reports or Agreed-Upon Procedures - AUP) apply conditionally to ECB-supervised institutions unless under lump-sum payment; restatements require AUP by...
References SRB's 2026 kick-off letter (Annex 1) and ECB-supervised list (Annex 6 as of 24 September 2025).
Compliance impact
Urgency: High - The 16 January 2026 deadline is imminent (today is 25 January 2026), risking immediate SRB penalties like estimates or maximum risk multipliers if submissions are missed/inaccurate; affects capital planning as contributions directly impact prudential positions.
CSSF notification regarding EMIR Article 7a(1) active account registration requirements. This is informational content about regulatory reporting and disclosure obligations for derivatives market participants.
This appears to be a general news update from the CSSF regulator, likely containing information relevant to multiple financial sectors and firm types. The lack of detailed content description suggests this is a low urgency, informational update.
This is an informational announcement about a public register of the audit profession maintained by CSSF (Luxembourg financial regulator). The content primarily concerns regulatory registration and licensing matters for audit firms.