CloneFraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm. Almost all firms and individuals must be authorised or registered by us to carry out or promote financial services in the UK. This firm is not authorised…
Why this matters
The FCA warning identifies an unauthorised clone firm (Coverfast/TempDrive) impersonating legitimate insurance firms (Wakam and Montgomery Kent Insurance Brokers). The content is administrative in nature—a public alert to protect consumers from fraud—with no binding rules or policy changes.
AMF activity Appointment Journalists End of the term of office of the AMF chairman and interim chairmanship
Why this matters
This regulatory update from the AMF (Autorité des Marchés Financiers) relates to the end of the term of office of the AMF chairman and the interim chairmanship. This is relevant for banking, investment management, and capital markets firms that are regulated by the AMF.
Market infrastructures Post-trading infrastructures EMIR Common procedures and methodologies on supervisory review and evaluation process of CCPs under Article 21 of EMIR: the AMF complies with ESMA guidelines
Why this matters
This regulatory update from the AMF relates to the supervisory review and evaluation process of central counterparty clearing houses (CCPs) under EMIR. It is relevant for banks, broker-dealers, and other firms involved in capital markets and post-trading infrastructure.
Asset management Savings protection Journalists The AMF is conducting a consultation on the end of life of private equity funds intended for retail investors
AI Analysis
The AMF is conducting a consultation on regulatory reforms governing the end-of-life management of retail private equity funds (FCPRs, FCPIs, and FIPs), with the objective of improving compliance with liquidation deadlines and enhancing investor protection through better information disclosure and operational safeguards. This initiative addresses systemic issues where fund managers have historically failed to respect contractual lifespan commitments, creating liquidity risks and investor communication failures.
Key dates
January 10, 2024
- Revised ELTIF Regulation came into application
June 13, 2024
- Enactment of Attractiveness Law No. 2024-537 (establishing 15-year maximum lock-up period)
November 12, 2024
- AMF decision approving amendments to General Regulation
December 5, 2024
- Effective date for new Article 422-120-16 (bank details collection requirement for newly established funds)
December 5, 2024
- Publication in Official Journal of the French Republic
Suggested considerations
*For All Retail Private Equity Fund Managers:
*Audit historical compliance with fund lifespan commitments over the preceding ten years to determine if warning requirements under Article 422-120-14-1 apply
*Update promotional materials to include required warnings if materiality thresholds are met (managing/having managed at least one other retail PE fund and at least three funds that reached end-of-life)
*Implement bank details collection for all funds established after December 5, 2024, incorporating requirements into subscription forms per Instruction DOC-2011-22
*Establish prior notification procedures for substantial changes to fund structure, investment strategy, or operations, with one-month advance notice to the AMF
What changed
The AMF has amended its General Regulation and policy framework to implement several substantive requirements:
Liquidation Compliance & Warnings
A new Article 422-120-14-1 requires management companies to include a warning in promotional materials if, over the ten years preceding fund authorization, the company failed to respect the lifespan of at least 50% of retail or professional private equity funds under its management.
Regulatory developments Europe & international Sustainable Finance Periodic & ongoing disclosures AMF's response to the International Sustainability Standards Board’s consultation on the exposure drafts on international sustainability disclosures
AI Analysis
The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF), France's financial markets regulator, issued a position paper on July 27, 2022, responding to the International Sustainability Standards Board's (ISSB) consultation on exposure drafts for international sustainability disclosure standards (IFRS S1 and S2). This matters for compliance professionals as it signals France's push for global-EU interoperability in ESG reporting, influencing how firms align ISSB "investor-focused" standards with Europe's double-materiality CSRD/ESRS framework to avoid dual reporting burdens. https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/amfs-eu-positions/amf-response-issb-consultation-exposure-drafts-sustainability-disclosure-standards; https://www.amf-france.org/sites/institutionnel/files/private/2022-07/Position%20paper%20ISSB%20AMF%20-%20July%202022_0.pdf
Suggested considerations
Monitor and map standards: Conduct gap analyses between current disclosures, ESRS, and ISSB S1/S2, focusing on interoperability (e.g., climate metrics, Scope 3 GHG).
Engage in transitions: Participate in potential ISSB Transition Resource Group or jurisdictional groups; prepare for phased ISSB implementation if adopted locally.
Enhance reporting processes: Update materiality assessments for double-materiality, quantitative climate financial impacts, and ESG breadth; leverage AMF's 2025 study on listed firms for benchmarks.
Stakeholder dialogue: Respond to ongoing consultations (e.g., EFRAG until Sep 2025) and track ISSB agenda priorities.
What changed
This is not a new regulation but AMF's recommendations to ISSB, emphasizing:
Interoperability with EU standards: AMF urges alignment between ISSB's financial materiality approach and EFRAG's double-materiality (impact + financial) ESRS, including jurisdictional working groups...
Broad ESG coverage: Calls for sector-agnostic standards beyond climate (e.g., full ESG spectrum via collaboration with EFRAG/GRI).
Phased implementation: Suggests gradual rollout of detailed requirements (e.g., Appendix B in S2) and an ISSB "Transition Resource Group" like IASB's for IFRS 9/15/17 to aid implementation.
Double-materiality advocacy: Prefers standards addressing all stakeholders, not just investors.
No binding changes; ISSB issued final IFRS S1/S2 in June 2023.
Compliance impact
Urgency: Medium. This 2022 AMF response is historical but highly relevant amid 2025 EFRAG simplifications emphasizing ISSB interoperability, as EU firms juggle CSRD with global ISSB momentum (e.g., IFRS finals in 2023). Matters for avoiding reporting fragmentation, with risks of supervisory scrutiny on French listed firms; low immediate enforcement but builds toward mandatory convergence.
Regulatory developments Europe & international Sustainable Finance Periodic & ongoing disclosures AMF's response to the EFRAG consultation on the draft European sustainability reporting standards
AI Analysis
The AMF's position paper responds to EFRAG's 2022 public consultation on the first set of draft European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) under the CSRD, welcoming their ambition on ESG topics and double materiality while urging proportionality, international interoperability, materiality focus, and alignment with EU laws like SFDR. This matters for compliance professionals as it shapes final ESRS, influencing mandatory sustainability disclosures for EU firms and financial market participants from 2024 onward, with potential simplifications affecting reporting burdens. https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news/amfs-response-efrag-consultation-draft-european-sustainability-reporting-standards
Key dates
July 2022
- AMF submits response to EFRAG consultation on draft ESRS. https://www.amf-france.org/sites/institutionnel/files/private/2022-07/AMF%20appendix%20to%20position%20paper%20on%20EFRAG%20consultation%20July%202022.pdf
2024
- First CSRD application for FY 2024 reports (large public-interest entities). https://www.amf-france.org/sites/institutionnel/files/private/2022-07/AMF%20appendix%20to%20position%20paper%20on%20EFRAG%20consultation%20July%202022.pdf
2025
- ESRS adoption by European Commission (first set covering SFDR needs). https://www.amf-france.org/sites/institutionnel/files/private/2022-07/AMF%20appendix%20to%20position%20paper%20on%20EFRAG%20consultation%20July%202022.pdf
2025); - EC Delegated Act on simplified ESRS, subject to 2-month EU Parliament/Council scrutiny. https://www.efrag.org/en/news-and-calendar/news/efrag-provides-its-technical-advice-on-draft-simplified-esrs-to-the-european-commission
Suggested considerations
Monitor ESRS evolution: Track EFRAG/EC updates on final standards, focusing on AMF priorities like materiality guidance and ISSB mapping.
Align reporting systems: Map ESRS to SFDR/Taxonomy data; test proportionality phased rollouts (e.g., climate first).
Engage stakeholders: Participate in ongoing consultations (e.g., EFRAG connectivity); benchmark against ISSB for interoperability.
What changed
This is a consultation response, not a final rule, but AMF highlights these priorities for ESRS development:
International interoperability: Convergence with ISSB standards to avoid duplication and meet investor needs across jurisdictions.
Proportionality in disclosures: Gradual implementation, prioritizing climate standards, balancing stakeholder needs with issuer costs, and ensuring SFDR coverage.
Materiality focus: Enhanced guidance on materiality assessments, centering company-led analysis without presuming topics' materiality upfront.
EU consistency: Avoid duplicating info from SFDR, Taxonomy, and other regs; rely on existing concepts.
Compliance impact
Urgency: Medium - Historical (2022) input shapes binding ESRS already applying in 2024/2025, but ongoing simplifications (e.g., 2025 EC advice) offer relief on burdens; critical for FY2026+ prep amid interoperability push, yet not immediate mandates. Matters for reducing overload, ensuring SFDR compliance, and avoiding EU fines (up to 10M EUR under CSRD).
MiCA Crypto-assets Innovation Cooperation Europe & international Crypto-asset markets: Agreement reached on the European Crypto-Assets regulation (MiCA)
Why this matters
This regulatory update on the European Crypto-Assets regulation (MiCA) is highly relevant for crypto-asset firms and fintechs, as it covers key topics such as authorization and licensing requirements, as well as consumer protection measures.
Sanctions & settlements Compliance Journalists Investment services providers The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a depositary for breaches of its professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined RBC Investor Services Bank France SA (RBC ISBF) €500,000 plus a warning on 20 July 2022 (published 08 January 2026) for breaches as a UCITS and AIF depositary, including 25 confirmed failures in tiered intervention procedures for investment ratio overruns and deficient monitoring of 14 questionable cash flows over 45 months. This decision underscores AMF's strict enforcement of depositary duties under French regulations implementing UCITS/AIFMD, emphasizing robust controls for ratio compliance, cash flow verification, and documentation. It matters for compliance teams as it provides precedent on what constitutes "irregular and deficient" oversight, potentially increasing scrutiny and fines for similar lapses in depositary functions.
Key dates
20 July 2022
- AMF Enforcement Committee decision date imposing €500,000 fine and warning on RBC ISBF
08 January 2026
- Public news release/publication date of the decision
Suggested considerations
Review depositary controls: Audit tiered intervention procedures for ratio overruns; ensure unique tracking (even if not upheld here) and redundancy elimination in reporting.
Enhance cash flow monitoring: For all inflows/outflows, collect "precise and convincing" docs (e.g., ownership proofs for advances >5% capital); flag inconsistencies with fund docs/prospectus.
Conduct gap analysis: Sample historical flows (e.g., 45-month lookbacks) across AIFs/UCITS; test against AMF objections standards from this and similar cases (e.g., CACEIS).
Update policies/procedures: Document controls for legality checks on instructions; train staff on evidentiary thresholds to avoid "deficient monitoring" findings.
Appeal if applicable: Lodge appeal against decision (no deadline specified).
What changed
This is an enforcement decision, not a new regulation, but it clarifies and reinforces existing depositary obligations under French UCITS/AIFMD rules (e.g., Articles L. 214-7 et seq.
Ratio monitoring and intervention: Depositaries must implement tiered procedures for investment/asset composition ratio breaches (e.g., diversification limits); 25 of 28 alleged anomalies were upheld...
Cash flow oversight: Must identify significant/inconsistent flows, verify instructions against laws, fund rules, prospectuses, and ensure ownership thresholds (e.g., 5% capital holding for advances);...
Compliance impact
Urgency: Medium – Recent publication (08 January 2026) signals ongoing AMF focus on depositary failings amid H2O-related probes, but stems from 2022 events with no immediate deadlines. Matters because it sets precedents for fine quantum (€500k) on procedural lapses, reinforces liability for cash/ratio controls, and aligns with pattern of multi-million fines (e.g., CACEIS €3.5m), urging preemptive audits to mitigate enforcement risk.
Savings protection Cooperation Crypto-assets Fintech Journalists The AMF and the ARPP are stepping up their cooperation to promote clear and responsible advertising of financial products
Why this matters
This regulatory update focuses on the cooperation between the AMF and ARPP to promote clear and responsible advertising of financial products, including crypto-assets. This impacts banking, investment management, and crypto firms, with implications for consumer protection, licensing, and technology/cyber risks.
Bids Financial disclosures & corporate financing The AMF reviews the key issues raised by the Veolia-Suez public offer
Why this matters
This regulatory update from the AMF discusses key issues raised by the Veolia-Suez public offer, which is relevant for banking, investment management, and capital markets firms that may be involved in or impacted by such corporate transactions.
Sanctions & settlements Journalists The AMF Enforcement Committee fines one natural person and five legal entities, including a management company, for failing to comply with several reporting obligations in relation to a concerted action carried out in the context of a takeover bid and, in the case of the...
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee imposed fines on one natural person and five legal entities, including an investment management company, for failing to comply with multiple reporting obligations related to a concerted action during a partial takeover bid.[User Query]. This enforcement action underscores the AMF's strict enforcement of transparency rules in takeover scenarios, serving as a critical reminder for market participants to adhere to disclosure timelines to avoid significant financial penalties and reputational damage.
Key dates
Within 4 trading days
- Declaration of crossing major holding thresholds or intent to continue acquisitions (AMF Form DOC-2005-01)
Immediate (same day)
- Notification of concerted action agreements in takeover contexts
Within 10 trading days
- Detailed position reports post-crossing
Suggested considerations
Review and enhance internal procedures for monitoring share positions, identifying concerted actions, and automating AMF filings.
Train front-office and compliance teams on takeover bid disclosures, including documentation of coordination (e.g., emails, agreements).
Implement pre-trade alerts for threshold breaches and conduct periodic audits of historical filings.
For management companies: Ensure portfolio managers report potential concert with external parties promptly; update compliance manuals with case lessons.
What changed
This is not a regulatory change or new requirement but an enforcement decision highlighting existing obligations under French financial markets law, particularly those governing concerted actions...
Timely disclosure of positions and intentions when parties act in concert, as per AMF regulations on major holdings and takeover bids (e.g., Article L.
Reporting thresholds for share acquisitions or concerted behaviors that could influence control, typically triggered at 5% crossings or changes.
No new rules were introduced; the decision reiterates...
Compliance impact
Urgency: High - This matters due to the AMF Enforcement Committee's pattern of fining reporting failures (e.g., €1.89M in July 2025 for late disclosures, €1.7M in June 2025 for shareholder breaches), signaling intensified scrutiny on M&A transparency amid volatile markets. Non-compliance risks fines up to €100M or 10% of turnover, plus bans, directly impacting investor trust and operations; firms should prioritize gap assessments immediately.
Derivatives or structured products Journalists The AMF has published a study of the profile of participants and their positions in the Matif agricultural commodities derivatives market
Why this matters
This regulatory update from the AMF (Autorité des Marchés Financiers) focuses on the profile of participants and their positions in the Matif agricultural commodities derivatives market.
Sanctions & settlements Journalists The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a portfolio asset management company for breaches of its professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined an unnamed portfolio asset management company €400,000 for multiple breaches of professional obligations, including non-operational investment/divestment procedures, inadequate conflict of interest management with group service providers, lack of transparency on distributor fee retrocessions, deficient client categorization, and weak AML/CFT due diligence. This enforcement action, mirroring recent similar cases against firms like Novaxia Investissement and Eternam, underscores the AMF's heightened scrutiny on operational robustness and transparency in asset management, serving as a critical reminder for firms to ensure procedures are fully implemented and documented to avoid personal liability for executives.
Key dates
9 September 2025
- AMF Enforcement Committee decision fining Eternam €400,000 (similar case on marketing, club deals, conflicts, valuation, AML/CFT)
10 December 2025
- AMF Enforcement Committee decision fining Novaxia Investissement €400,000 and director €100,000 (investment processes, group providers, distributor fees, client categorization, AML/CFT)
31 December 2025
- AMF Enforcement Committee decision fining M Capital Partners €200,000 and directors €70,000/€35,000 (investment systems, conflicts, AML/CFT)
Suggested considerations
Audit internal procedures: Immediately review investment/divestment, valuation, and allocation processes for operational status, completeness, traceability, and documentation of due diligence.
Enhance conflict and transparency controls: Implement/test effective conflicts of interest policies for group providers/distributors; update investor disclosures on fees/retrocessions with clear justifications.
Strengthen AML/CFT and client categorization: Validate risk mapping, procedures, and due diligence; ensure formalization of independent valuer work and external expert oversight.
Senior manager accountability: Conduct gap analysis attributing responsibilities; train executives on personal liability risks.
Mock AMF inspections: Simulate Enforcement Committee reviews, focusing on evidence of procedure adherence.
What changed
This is an enforcement decision rather than new legislation, but it reinforces and clarifies existing regulatory requirements under AMF professional obligations for portfolio asset managers (sociétés...
Investment/divestment processes must be fully operational, with traceability of compliance checks against fund policies and formalized due diligence before allocations.
Effective conflicts of interest policies are mandatory when using group service providers, with comprehensive, accurate investor disclosures on related remuneration.
Full transparency required on retrocessions of management fees to distributors, including justification of added value.
Robust client categorization and AML/CFT systems, including operational procedures, risk mapping, and adequate due diligence on fund assets/liabilities.
No explicit regulatory changes, but these...
Compliance impact
Urgency: High - Recent cluster of identical fines (€200k-€500k total per case) in late 2025 signals AMF's enforcement priority on operational deficiencies in asset management, with personal sanctions escalating risks for leadership. Firms with similar setups (group providers, AIFs/club deals) face imminent inspection risk; non-compliance could trigger fines, reputational damage, and appeals processes.
Supervision MAR Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies Publication of the SPOT inspection campaign summary on market abuse prevention systems in asset management companies
Why this matters
This regulatory update from the AMF (French financial markets authority) relates to the publication of a summary of their SPOT inspection campaign on market abuse prevention systems in asset management companies.
Risk and Trend Mapping Markets Europe & international Asset management Executive & other private individuals Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers The...
Why this matters
This regulatory update from the AMF covers the 2022 Markets and Risk Outlook, which is likely to be informational in nature and cover trends and risks across investment management, capital markets, and asset management firms.
Supervision MIFID Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies The AMF publishes a summary of its SPOT inspections on the theme of best execution in asset management companies
Why this matters
This regulatory update from the AMF (French financial markets regulator) focuses on inspections of asset management companies regarding best execution practices, which is a key investor protection requirement under MiFID II.
AMF activity Appointment Journalists Grégoire Vuarlot is appointed coordinator of the ACPR and AMF Joint Unit starting 1st July 2022
Why this matters
This regulatory update announces the appointment of a new coordinator for the ACPR and AMF Joint Unit, which oversees banking, investment management, and wealth management firms. The appointment is informational in nature and does not indicate any immediate regulatory changes.
Innovation AMF activity Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers The AMF continues its data strategy with the release of short selling data to the public
Why this matters
This regulatory update from the AMF relates to the release of short selling data to the public, which impacts capital markets and investment management firms. It also involves reporting and disclosure requirements for listed companies.
Crypto-assets Innovation Market infrastructures on blockchain technology: publication of the European Pilot Regime regulation
Why this matters
This regulatory update is focused on the publication of the European Pilot Regime regulation, which is relevant for crypto-asset and blockchain-based market infrastructure firms. It covers topics related to technology and authorization/licensing requirements for these types of firms.