Live Updates

FSCA Press Release - HIGH COURT CONFIRMS FUSION GUARANTEES (PTY) LTD (“FUSION”) ARE CONDUCTING UNREGISTERED INSURANCE BUSINESS

AI Analysis

The FSCA reported that the Gauteng Division of the High Court confirmed Fusion Guarantees (Pty) Ltd was conducting unregistered insurance business when it issued construction guarantees. The ruling matters because it confirms that the substance of the instrument, not its label or NCA registration status, determines whether a guarantee is regulated as non-life insurance under the Insurance Act.

Key dates

2026-04-09
FSCA press release on Fusion Guarantees and unregistered insurance business
2026-03-23
Gauteng Division of the High Court delivered the judgment referenced in the press release

Suggested considerations

  • Compliance teams may wish to assess whether construction, performance, or surety-style products could be characterised as non-life insurance under the Insurance Act.
  • Firms may wish to review whether their current authorisations actually cover guarantee products that assume contingent obligations in exchange for consideration.
  • Legal and compliance functions may wish to align product documentation, marketing language, and contractual mechanics with the true regulatory character of the instrument.
  • Counterparty due diligence processes may wish to verify whether guarantee issuers are authorised as insurers before acceptance of the instrument.
  • Boards and senior management may wish to review governance controls for regulatory classification risk around bespoke guarantee products.

What changed

The High Court granted the FSCA’s counter-application and declared Fusion’s construction guarantees to be non-life insurance policies under the Insurance Act. The court held that issuing those guarantees without insurance authorisation breached section 5(1) of the Insurance Act, and it interdicted Fusion from issuing construction guarantees going forward. The court also declared the guarantees referenced by Elasah to be insurance policies and ordered costs against Fusion and Elasah. The decision reinforces the FSCA’s position that registration under the National Credit Act does not by itself make insurance business lawful where the product is, in substance, insurance.

Compliance impact

The ruling is a significant enforcement precedent because it confirms that unlicensed issuance of guarantee-like products can be treated as insurance-law contravention, exposing firms to interdicts and costs. The practical consequence is that firms operating near the guarantee, surety, or contingent-obligation perimeter may face regulatory and enforceability risk if they are not licensed for insur

Who is affected

  • Non-bank guarantee providers
  • Construction guarantee issuers
  • NCA-registered entities
  • Short-term insurers
  • Brokers and intermediaries involved in guarantee products
  • Contractors and guarantee beneficiaries
  • Municipalities and state entities
  • Insurance Act 18 of 2017
  • National Credit Act 34 of 2005
  • Financial Sector Regulation Act 9 of 2017
  • Short-Term Insurance Act 53 of 1998

AI-generated analysis. May contain errors or omissions — verify with the original FSCA source before acting. Full disclaimer.

What the FSCA said

FSCA Press Release - HIGH COURT CONFIRMS FUSION GUARANTEES (PTY) LTD (“FUSION”) ARE CONDUCTING UNREGISTERED INSURANCE BUSINESS

Published by FSCA . Read the full notice at the source for the authoritative text.

Relevant Firm Types

InsuranceFintechCredit UnionAll Firms
View Original on FSCA Back to Feed

Share this update