The Securities and Exchange Commission today issued an order granting temporary exemptive relief from certain compliance dates adopted under Regulation NMS: Minimum Pricing Increments, Access Fees and Transparency of Better Priced Orders as follows:…
Why this matters
This regulatory update from the SEC relates to compliance with certain rules under Regulation NMS, which impacts capital markets participants such as broker-dealers and banks.
Update of Circular CSSF 07/325 on Provisions relating to credit institutions and investment firms of EU origin established in Luxembourg by way of branches or exercising activities in Luxembourg by way of free provision of services, as amended by Circulars CSSF 21/765 and CSSF 22/827
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 25/898 updates Luxembourg's supervisory framework for EU-origin credit institutions and investment firms operating in Luxembourg through branches or free provision of services. This amendment enhances the self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) used by the CSSF to align supervisory oversight with current regulatory priorities, particularly adding UCI administration as a new thematic module. The update reflects the CSSF's evolving supervisory focus and requires affected institutions to demonstrate compliance with expanded assessment criteria.
Key dates
31 October 2025
- Circular CSSF 25/898 published by the CSSF
19 December 2025
- Related modernization framework (Circular CSSF 25/901) entered into force for Part II UCIs, SIFs, and SICARs
No specific implementation deadline stated Deadline
- Institutions should align their SAQ responses and compliance documentation with the updated framework immediately upon publication
Suggested considerations
*Update Self-Assessment Processes
Revise internal SAQ completion procedures to address the new UCI administration module
Ensure all thematic modules reflect current supervisory expectations
*Assess UCI Administration Compliance
If the institution provides or is involved in UCI administration services, conduct a detailed assessment of compliance with CSSF expectations
What changed
The circular introduces the following material modifications to Circular CSSF 07/325:
New Supervisory Module
UCI administration has been added as a thematic module to the self-assessment questionnaire, reflecting increased regulatory attention to fund administration practices.
Enhanced Self-Assessment...
Existing modules have been updated to better align with supervisory objectives and current regulatory priorities.
The revised SAQ now captures a broader range of supervisory points of focus relevant to branch operations and cross-border service provision.
Scope Clarification
The circular applies to credit institutions whose head office is in another EU Member State and to investment firms of EU origin established in Luxembourg by way of branches or exercising activities...
The Bank's Court of Directors acts as a unitary board, setting the organisation's strategy and budget and taking key decisions on resourcing and appointments. Required to meet a minimum seven times per year, it has five executive members from the Bank and up to nine non-executive members.
Why this matters
This regulatory update discusses the Bank of England's Court of Directors, which is responsible for setting the organization's strategy and making key decisions. This is relevant for banking, investment management, and wealth management firms, as it covers prudential requirements, operational resilience, and...
Warning Warning Savings protection The AMF warns the public against fraudulent communications offering investment services impersonating Financière du Nogentais
Why this matters
This is a warning from the AMF (French financial regulator) about fraudulent communications impersonating a specific investment firm, Financière du Nogentais. This impacts investment management and wealth management firms, and relates to consumer protection and authorization/licensing issues.
Die Schweiz schliesst sich den weiteren Massnahmen des 18. Sanktionspakets der Europäischen Union (EU) gegenüber Russland sowie den zusätzlich zum 18. Sanktionspaket erlassenen Massnahmen gegenüber Belarus an. Dies hat der Bundesrat am 29. Oktober 2025 beschlossen. Im Fokus stehen Massnahmen im Güter-, Finanz und…
AI Analysis
Switzerland has aligned with additional EU measures from the 18th sanctions package against Russia and specific Belarus measures, amending the Ordinance on Measures against Belarus (SR 946.231.116.9) to focus on goods, financial, and energy sectors. This strengthens the sanctions regime against Belarus to mirror Russia's more closely, aiming to enhance effectiveness and prevent circumvention. Compliance teams must prioritize asset freezes, transaction prohibitions, and reporting to avoid enforcement risks from FINMA and SECO.
Key dates
18 July 2025
- EU adopts 18th sanctions package against Russia and additional Belarus measures
29 October 2025
- Swiss Federal Council decides to align and amends SR 946.231.116.9
30 October 2025
- New provisions enter into force
13 December 2025
- Related expansion of Russia/Belarus lists (22 persons, 42 entities, 116 ships, 45 trade firms) takes effect, relevant for harmonization context
Suggested considerations
Immediately screen client portfolios, transactions, and assets against updated SECO sanctions lists for Belarus (and cross-reference Russia lists).
Freeze assets of newly sanctioned persons/entities and prohibit dealings (e.g., no transactions with listed banks, no exports of restricted goods).
Report all affected business relationships to SECO promptly; conduct parallel GwG AML checks and file SARs if suspicions persist.
Update compliance systems, transaction monitoring rules, and staff training for goods/financial/energy sanctions; cease any prohibited services (e.g., SWIFT-like messaging for listed banks).
Review third-party exposures (e.g., Drittländer firms) for evasion risks and document compliance efforts for FINMA audits.
What changed
- Alignment with EU's 18th sanctions package (adopted 18 July 2025) and additional Belarus-specific measures, targeting Belarus's involvement in Russia's war against Ukraine.
Amendments to SR 946.231.116.9, harmonizing Belarus sanctions with Russia's regime, particularly in goods (e.g., export restrictions on chemicals, metals, plastics for military/tech strengthening),...
Requirements for financial intermediaries to implement prohibitions, freeze assets of sanctioned persons, and report affected business relationships to SECO (State Secretariat for Economic Affairs).
Reporting to SECO does not exempt intermediaries from AML due diligence under Art. 6 GwG (Anti-Money Laundering Act) or suspicious activity reports under Art.
Compliance impact
Urgency: High - Effective 30 October 2025, these changes demand immediate portfolio screening and reporting, with non-compliance risking FINMA enforcement, asset seizure, or criminal penalties under sanctions laws. Matters due to rapid alignment with evolving EU packages, increasing circumvention risks via Belarus, and heightened FINMA scrutiny on financial intermediaries amid ongoing Russia/Ukraine conflict.
Europe & international Sanctions & settlements Publication of the annual ESMA Report on Sanctions and Measures for 2024: AMF imposes the highest amounts in Europe
AI Analysis
The ESMA Annual Report on Sanctions and Measures for 2024, published on 16 October 2025, aggregates enforcement data from EEA national competent authorities (NCAs), highlighting that the French AMF imposed the highest total sanctions at €29.4 million—nearly a third of the EEA's €100 million aggregate—primarily under MAR and MiFID II. This matters for compliance professionals as it signals intensified enforcement focus on market abuse and investor protection across Europe, with France leading in both fine amounts and settlement usage, underscoring a trend toward higher penalties and agile resolution mechanisms.
Key dates
16 October 2025
- ESMA publishes second consolidated Annual Sanctions Report for 2024 data
What changed
This is not a new regulation but a retrospective report documenting 2024 enforcement trends; no direct regulatory changes are introduced. Key observations include a significant rise in total fine amounts to over €100 million (from €71 million in 2023) despite stable sanction volumes (975 vs. 976), with MAR (377 sanctions, €45.5 million) and MiFID II/MiFIR (294 sanctions, €44.5 million) dominating. Notable shifts: increased settlement usage (94 agreements for €21.9 million, 22% of total), with AMF at 18% of its penalties via settlements (vs.
Compliance impact
Urgency: medium – This report reinforces existing rules without new requirements, but signals escalating financial penalties (up 40% YoY) and settlement trends, pressuring firms to prioritize MAR/MiFID compliance to avoid outsized AMF-style fines, especially in France or cross-EEA operations. Matters for resource allocation toward surveillance and remediation, as NCAs like AMF demonstrate willingness for multimillion-euro penalties.
Die Schweiz schliesst sich den weiteren Massnahmen des 18. Sanktionspakets der Europäischen Union (EU) gegenüber Russland sowie den zusätzlich zum 18. Sanktionspaket erlassenen Massnahmen gegenüber Belarus an. Dies hat der Bundesrat am 29. Oktober 2025 beschlossen. Im Fokus stehen Massnahmen im Güter-, Finanz und…
AI Analysis
On October 29, 2025, the Swiss Federal Council (Bundesrat) adopted comprehensive sanctions measures aligned with the EU's 18th sanctions package against Russia and additional measures against Belarus, effective October 30, 2025. This enforcement action significantly expands financial transaction prohibitions, export restrictions, and asset freezes, requiring Swiss financial intermediaries to immediately implement new compliance obligations across banking, goods trade, and energy sectors.
Key dates
October 29, 2025
- Federal Council decision adopted
October 30, 2025
- Measures effective date
Ongoing Deadline
- Financial intermediaries must implement prohibitions, freeze assets of sanctioned persons, and report affected business relationships to SECO (State Secretariat for Economic Affairs)
Suggested considerations
*Implement transaction prohibitions on all 45+ Russian banks now subject to complete bans (previously 23 with partial restrictions)
*Freeze assets of all sanctioned persons and entities immediately upon notice
*Report affected business relationships to SECO—this reporting obligation does not relieve firms from conducting additional due diligence when suspicious indicators exist
*Screen counterparties against updated sanctions lists, particularly the RDIF and its sub-funds
*Cease all transactions with newly prohibited entities, including payment system operators and financial institutions in third countries (Belarus, Kazakhstan) supporting Russian war economy
What changed
Financial Sector Restrictions
The Bundesrat expanded transaction prohibitions on Russian banks substantially:
Extended existing transaction bans from 23 Russian banks to cover all specialized payment messaging services, converting these to complete transaction prohibitions
Introduced new transaction prohibitions for 22 additional Russian banks
Prohibited all transactions with the Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF), its sub-funds, and affiliated enterprises, tightening restrictions previously limited to RDIF-financed projects
Export...
Notification of Amendments to Annex 1 of MAS Notice 211 on Minimum and Best Practice Training and Competency Standards for Direct General Insurers and Appendix 1 of MAS Notice 502 on Minimum and Best Practice Training and Competency Standards for Direct General Insurers.
AI Analysis
This MAS circular (ID 14/25 and FAS 16/2025, published 30 October 2025) notifies amendments to Annex 1 of MAS Notice 211 and Appendix 1 of MAS Notice 502, focusing on minimum and best practice **training and competency standards** for direct general insurers and insurance brokers. It matters because these updates strengthen regulatory expectations for staff qualifications in the general insurance sector, ensuring higher professional standards amid evolving risks like AML/CFT, with direct implications for licensing compliance and operational resilience.
Key dates
30 October 2025
- Publication date of ID 14/25 and FAS 16/2025 circular notifying amendments
Suggested considerations
Download and review the full amendment document (ID 14/25 and FAS 16/2025) from https://www.mas.gov.sg/regulation/circulars/id14_25.
Assess current training and competency programs against updated Annex 1 (MAS Notice 211) and Appendix 1 (MAS Notice 502), focusing on minimum standards and best practices for staff.
Update internal policies, CPD requirements, and staff certification processes to incorporate changes, including any new "fit and proper" clarifications.
Conduct gap analysis for affected representatives and implement training by any specified effective date; maintain records for MAS audits.
For brokers and composite insurers, ensure alignment across general and life business lines if overlapping.
What changed
The amendments target Annex 1 of MAS Notice 211 (applicable to direct general insurers) and Appendix 1 of MAS Notice 502 (applicable to insurance brokers), both addressing Minimum and Best Practice Training and Competency Standards. Specific changes are not detailed in the notification summary but likely include clarifications on applicability, "fit and proper" criteria for staff, and enhanced continuing professional development (CPD) requirements, as referenced in related Notice 211 updates.
Compliance impact
Urgency: High – These amendments directly impact core licensing and operational requirements for general insurers and brokers, with non-compliance risking supervisory actions, fines, or authorization issues under the Insurance Act. Given the 30 October 2025 publication and MAS's pattern in recent AML/CFT updates (effective shortly after notification, e.g., 1 July 2025), firms face tight timelines for updates, especially as training gaps could amplify vulnerabilities in high-risk areas like customer due diligence.
The Financial Policy Committee (FPC) welcomes today the Prudential Regulation Authority’s (PRA’s) policy statement 20/25 – The Strong and Simple Framework: The simplified capital regime for Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs) – near-final.
AI Analysis
The Financial Policy Committee (FPC) welcomes the Prudential Regulation Authority's (PRA) Policy Statement (PS) 20/25, which finalizes the second phase of the "Strong and Simple Framework" by introducing a simplified capital regime for Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs), alongside liquidity simplifications. This matters because it reduces regulatory burdens, enhances competition among smaller UK banks and building societies, and maintains resilience without full Basel 3.1 standards, with implementation on 1 January 2027.
Key dates
17 January 2025 Deadline
Deadline for comments on related CP14/24
28 October 2025
Publication of near-final PS20/25
1 January 2026
Full Basel 3.1 standards apply to ICR opt-in firms (ICR revoked); some changes to SoP2/23, ICAAP/ILAAP update frequencies effective from PS4/26 publication
20 January 2026
Publication of final PS4/26 confirming PS20/25; effective date for ICAAP/ILAAP updates (including reverse stress-testing)
1 January 2027
Simplified capital regime for SDDTs takes full effect
Suggested considerations
Assess SDDT eligibility: Confirm if firm meets scope criteria from PS15/23; decide between SDDT regime or full Basel 3.1.
Update capital frameworks: Implement Pillar 1/2A simplifications, SCB, and reporting changes; recalibrate risk-weighted assets, buffers, and stress testing.
ICR transitions: If applicable, prepare for 1 January 2026 Basel 3.1 shift or 1 January 2027 SDDT entry; cease ICR reliance.
Policy and process revisions: Revise ICAAP/ILAAP per 20 January 2026 changes; adapt reporting (51 descoped templates).
Supervisory engagement: Monitor CCoR cluster limits (200% trigger); engage PRA on Pillar 2A via CP12/25.
What changed
- Pillar 1 simplifications: Adoption of Basel 3.1 standardised approaches to credit and operational risk; disapplication of due diligence for credit risk, simplifications to market risk, removal of...
Pillar 2A methodologies: Simplifications for credit risk, credit concentration risk (CCoR), and operational risk; amendments to single-name concentration monitoring (cluster limit tightened to 200%,...
Capital buffers: Introduction of a new Single Capital Buffer (SCB) replacing the Capital Conservation Buffer (CCoB), Countercyclical Capital Buffer (CCyB), and PRA buffer; removal of CCyB adjustment...
Stress testing and reporting: Replacement of cyclical stress testing with non-cyclical framework; increased descoped reporting templates from 38 to 51, plus SDDT-specific versions of four templates.
Revocation of Interim Capital Regime (ICR): Firms opting into ICR must transition to full Basel 3.1 on 1 January 2026 or SDDT regime on 1 January 2027.
Compliance impact
Urgency: High – With full implementation on 1 January 2027 (less than 12 months from today), SDDTs face tight timelines for capital recalibrations, ICR exits, and reporting overhauls; missing deadlines risks supervisory intervention or full Basel 3.1 compliance costs. This significantly eases burdens (e.g., simpler buffers, reduced reporting) but requires proactive gap analysis to leverage simplifications while ensuring resilience.
**PS19/25** is the PRA's near-final policy statement finalizing how remaining Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) provisions will be restated into the PRA Rulebook, effective January 1, 2027. This represents a critical step in the UK's transition away from assimilated EU law, giving the PRA expanded rule-making authority over UK banks, building societies, and investment firms while introducing targeted policy changes to securitisation, credit risk treatment, and ECAI mapping.
Key dates
28 October 2025
- PRA published near-final policy statement PS19/25
Q1 2026
- PRA intends to publish final policies and rule instruments alongside or shortly after final Basel 3.1 package publication
1 January 2026
- Implementation date for certain proposals finalized in PS12/25 (limited scope)
1 January 2027
- Implementation date for policies and requirements in PS19/25 (primary implementation date)
Suggested considerations
*Review the final policy statement when published in Q1 2026 to understand specific rule changes applicable to your firm's business model
*Assess securitisation impacts: If your firm engages in securitisation activities, particularly synthetic SRT structures with unfunded credit protection, evaluate compliance with clarified supervisory expectations in SS9/13
*Evaluate mortgage capital treatment: Firms with significant mortgage lending should assess impact of new capital rules for certain mortgage exposures
*Update ECAI mapping processes: Firms relying on external credit assessments must prepare for amendments reflecting Basel 3.1 implementation
*Establish implementation timeline: Develop a project plan for January 1, 2027 implementation, including:
What changed
The near-final policy confirms and finalizes the following substantive amendments:
Securitisation Requirements
Largely preserves current requirements and supervisory expectations with targeted policy changes
Introduces a new formulaic p-factor for the standardised approach to securitisation
Establishes new capital rules for certain mortgage exposures
Clarifies supervisory expectations for unfunded credit protection in synthetic Significant Risk Transfer (SRT) securitisations by adding expectations to SS9/13
Level of Application of CRR...
PS18/25, published by the PRA on 28 October 2025, retires the "refined methodology" for Pillar 2A capital calculations, replacing it with reliance on the Basel 3.1 Credit Risk Standardised Approach (CR SA) for greater risk sensitivity, transparency, and proportionality. This near-final policy simplifies the Pillar 2A framework, reduces administrative burdens, and aligns with broader Basel 3.1 implementation and the Strong and Simple regime for Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs), promoting safety, soundness, and competition. It matters because it directly impacts credit risk capital add-ons for affected firms, requiring updates to ICAAP/SREP processes ahead of Basel 3.1 timelines.
Key dates
28 October 2025
- PS18/25 publication with near-final policy and PRA feedback to CP9/24/CP7/24 consultations
January 2026
- PS2/26 published as final policy, minor adjustment to SS31/15 para 5.12A
Q2 2026
- Expected finalisation of CP12/25 Phase 1 proposals (Pillar 2A review, including IRB benchmarking removal)
1 July 2026
- Effective date for pension obligation risk amendments in SoP5/15 and SS31/15 clarifications (IRRBB changes partially deferred)
Basel 3.1 Implementation Date (TBD, aligned with CR SA go
live); - Retirement of refined methodology and related credit/operational risk changes
Suggested considerations
Review and update internal Pillar 2A methodologies, ICAAP/SREP documentation to remove refined methodology reliance and align with Basel 3.1 CR SA.
For SDDTs: Transition to SoP5/25 and SS4/25; assess impacts from PS20/25 overlap.
Model/calculate potential capital impacts from CR SA changes vs. prior IRB benchmarking adjustments.
Prepare for IRRBB/pension risk clarifications in SS31/15 submissions from 1 July 2026; monitor CP12/25 review.
Engage PRA supervisors on firm-specific transitions; update reporting (e.g., anticipate FSA076 streamlining).
What changed
- Retirement of Refined Methodology: Eliminates supervisory adjustments to Pillar 2A credit risk add-ons based on IRB benchmarking, as Basel 3.1 CR SA better captures risks and reduces gaps between...
Policy Material Updates:
- Near-final amendments to Statement of Policy (SoP) 5/15 – The PRA’s methodologies for setting Pillar 2 capital.
- Final amendments to Supervisory Statement (SS) 31/15 –...
IRRBB and Pension Obligation Risk: Clarifications only (no substantive changes); minor IRRBB updates in SS31/15 deferred due to ongoing review (CP12/25 Phase 1); pension risk amendments finalized.
Future Alignment: Proposals from CP12/25 (e.g., removing IRB benchmarking, streamlining FSA076/FSA077 reporting) to be finalized in Q2 2026 PS, not reflected here.
Compliance impact
Urgency: High – Firms must act now to recalibrate Pillar 2A capital ahead of Basel 3.1 and 1 July 2026 effective dates, as retirement eliminates adjustments that reduced add-ons for low-risk CR SA firms, potentially increasing capital requirements despite Basel 3.1 offsets. Non-compliance risks supervisory scrutiny in SREP/ICAAP, higher Pillar 2A requirements, and misalignment with simplified regimes; benefits include reduced complexity/burden long-term.
This regulatory update from the PRA provides information on its methodologies for setting Pillar 2 capital requirements, which is relevant for banks, asset managers, and wealth managers.
SS31/15 is the PRA's foundational supervisory statement establishing expectations for how UK-regulated banks and large investment firms must conduct their Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) and how the PRA will evaluate these assessments through its Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP). This guidance is critical because it directly determines the capital requirements firms must maintain and establishes the supervisory framework through which the PRA assesses whether firms hold sufficient capital to cover material risks.
Key dates
29 July 2015
- SS31/15 first published, replacing PRA SS5/13 and PRA SS6/13
1 July 2026
- Effective date for updates to SS31/15 (as referenced in recent amendments)
Ongoing Deadline
- Firms must carry out ICAAP on a continuous basis in accordance with PRA ICAA rules
Suggested considerations
*Immediate Compliance Actions
*Establish ICAAP Framework: Implement a comprehensive ICAAP that covers all material risks identified by the firm and the PRA, including those specific to the firm's business model and risk profile
*Risk Identification and Assessment: Conduct thorough identification of all material risks (IRRBB, market risk, operational risk, concentration risk, group risk, pension obligations, foreign currency lending) and assess capital adequacy against these risks
*Stress Testing and Scenario Analysis: Develop and maintain robust stress testing and scenario analysis capabilities, including:
Results of stress tests carried out in accordance with CRR requirements for firms using IRB approaches or internal models
What changed
The supervisory statement establishes several core regulatory expectations:
ICAAP Requirements
Firms must assess on an ongoing basis whether they hold sufficient capital to cover all material risks, including interest rate risk in the banking book (IRRBB), market risk, operational risk,...
Firms must implement stress testing and scenario analysis as integral components of capital planning
The management body must be actively involved and engaged in all relevant stages of the ICAAP process
SREP Assessment Framework
The PRA reviews and evaluates:
Arrangements, strategies, processes and mechanisms implemented by a firm to comply with regulatory requirements
**PS20/25** represents the second and final phase of the PRA's "Strong and Simple Framework," establishing a significantly simplified capital regime for Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs) while maintaining their resilience. This near-final policy statement, published on 28 October 2025, fundamentally restructures capital requirements, liquidity rules, and operational frameworks for SDDTs—a critical development for smaller deposit-taking institutions seeking regulatory relief from disproportionate compliance burdens.
Key dates
2026 (specific date TBD)
– PRA to make final rules and policy covering the entire Basel 3.1 package once HM Treasury makes commencement regulations to revoke relevant CRR provisions
31 March 2026 Deadline
– Deadline for firms wishing to enter the SDDT regime to notify the PRA and benefit from the simplified framework at implementation
1 January 2027
– Implementation date for the simplified capital regime for SDDTs; the Interim Capital Regime will no longer apply
2027 (specific date TBD)
– PRA to implement restatement of CRR requirements (PS19/25)
Suggested considerations
*For SDDTs Currently Operating or Considering Entry:
*Notification Decision – Determine whether to enter the SDDT regime and submit notification to the PRA by 31 March 2026 if seeking to benefit from simplified rules.
*Policy Review – Conduct comprehensive review of PS20/25, related policy statements (PS18/25, PS19/25, PS8/25, PS14/25), and supporting methodologies (SoP5/25, SS4/25, amendments to SoP2/23).
*Capital Calculation Transition – Prepare systems and processes to transition from current capital calculation methodologies to Basel 3.1 standardised approaches with SDDT simplifications, including:
Removal of CCR and CVA calculations for derivatives
What changed
The simplified capital regime introduces structural changes across all three pillars of capital requirements:
Pillar 1 (Risk-Weighted Assets)
SDDTs must apply Basel 3.1 standardised approaches for credit risk and operational risk, with specific simplifications.
Due diligence requirements in the standardised approach to credit risk are disapplied for SDDTs.
Counterparty credit risk (CCR) for derivatives and credit valuation adjustment (CVA) risk are disapplied (with minor exceptions).
Market risk framework is simplified, with SDDTs applying the credit risk approach to trading book positions and removal of foreign-exchange and commodity risk capital requirements.
This regulatory update from the PRA sets out their approach to exercising certain powers related to securitization under the CRR rules. This is relevant for banking and capital markets firms that engage in securitization activities, as well as all firms subject to the Securitisation (CRR) Part of the PRA Rulebook.
This regulatory update from the PRA is relevant to banks, building societies, and PRA-designated investment firms. It sets out the PRA's approach to considering applications from these firms to not apply or modify rules in the Counterparty Credit Risk (CRR) Part of the PRA Rulebook, which is related to prudential...
This regulatory update from the PRA sets out their approach to granting waivers and permissions related to the Securitisation (CRR) Part of the PRA Rulebook. This is relevant for banking and capital markets firms that are subject to these rules.
This document sets out a technical amendment to the Basel Framework. The amendment relates to the circumstance where a bank uses a guarantee or credit derivative to hedge the counterparty credit risk (CCR) of a derivative exposure subject to the standardised approach to counterparty credit risk or the internal models…
AI Analysis
The Basel Committee has finalized a technical amendment to the Basel Framework clarifying how banks should treat guarantees and credit derivatives used to hedge counterparty credit risk on derivative exposures. The change matters because it affects exposure measurement and capital treatment under SA-CCR and the internal models method, especially where protection is fixed, capped, or only partially covers the exposure.
Key dates
2024-11-27
The technical amendment was published for consultation
2025-01-31 Deadline
Comment deadline on the consultation version
2025-10-28
The BIS page reflects the final consolidated standard
2028-11-01 Deadline
Committee members agreed to implement the revised standard by this date at the latest
Suggested considerations
Compliance teams may wish to identify derivative portfolios where fixed or capped guarantees or credit derivatives are used as CCR hedges under SA-CCR or IMM.
Firms should consider reviewing capital calculation logic and documentation for protected and unprotected exposure portions to confirm the final Basel treatment is reflected.
Banks may wish to assess whether any legacy policy, model, or reporting language still references the consultation version and needs updating ahead of implementation.
Risk and capital teams should consider whether exclusions for securities financing transactions and securitisation exposures are correctly applied in governance, procedures, and systems.
What changed
The amendment clarifies the treatment of guarantees and credit derivatives that hedge counterparty credit risk of derivative exposures subject to the standardized approach to counterparty credit risk or the internal models method. The Basel text indicates the final standard aligns the treatment of fixed or capped protection more closely with the treatment of eligible collateral and residual risk to the original counterparty.
Compliance impact
The impact is moderate to high for banks with material derivative CCR portfolios because the amendment changes how certain hedges are recognized in capital calculations. The regulator describes the change as technical rather than substantial, but it is still a binding Basel Framework adjustment that firms will need to implement consistently to avoid misstatement of CCR capital requirements.
Informs insurers on the issuance of the Response to Consultation Paper on the proposed enhancements to the RBC 2 capital treatment for investment in structured products and infrastructure investments for insurers under RBC 2 framework.
AI Analysis
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) issued Circular ID 13/25 on 28 October 2025, responding to feedback on its October 2024 consultation paper proposing enhancements to the RBC 2 capital treatment for insurers' investments in structured products and infrastructure assets. This matters because it finalizes revisions to MAS Notice 133, introducing differentiated risk charges to encourage infrastructure investments while maintaining prudential safeguards, with changes effective 31 March 2026.
Suggested considerations
Review and update internal capital models, valuation policies, and investment portfolios for structured products and infrastructure assets to align with new risk charges and definitions.
Assess eligibility of current holdings against refined qualifying criteria (e.g., infrastructure corporates at ≥75% threshold) and prepare look-through analyses for funds.
Monitor MAS updates on the sustainable infrastructure pilot program and evaluate participation if applicable.
Conduct gap analysis on MAS Notice 133 revisions once finalized; test systems for equity correlation factors and reduced unrated debt periods.
Document compliance readiness and report to senior management/board ahead of 31 March 2026 effective date.
What changed
- Structured Products: Removes the 50% risk charge option on full market value; recognizes credit ratings from external institutions for securitized asset tranches; applies 50% loading for rated...
Infrastructure Investments: Adopts Insurance Capital Standard (ICS)-aligned definitions (e.g., adding "Water utilities", "Waste management utilities", "Energy utilities"); refines qualifying criteria...
Pilot Program: MAS is collaborating on a pilot for sustainable infrastructure projects with risk-appropriate capital charges and investment caps to build insurer expertise.
Compliance impact
Urgency: High – Insurers have ~13 months (effective 31 March 2026) to implement changes, but portfolio recalibrations, model validations, and potential capital impacts require immediate planning to avoid solvency shortfalls or missed investment opportunities in infrastructure. Non-compliance risks heightened supervisory scrutiny under RBC 2.
This press release provides an update on the global situation of undertakings for collective investment at the end of September 2025, which is relevant for investment management and wealth management firms.
Crypto-assets Investment services Financial services providers The Financial Stability Board and the International Organisation of Securities Commissions publish two reports assessing the implementation of recommendations on crypto-asset and stablecoin activities
Why this matters
This regulatory update is focused on the implementation of recommendations related to crypto-assets and stablecoins, which are relevant for crypto exchanges, banks, and fintech firms operating in the digital asset space.
27 OCT 2025, 10:00 AM
The SCA and DFSA strengthen regulatory cooperation with Memorandum of…
Why this matters
This regulatory update announces a new Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the Securities and Commodities Authority (SCA) and the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) to enhance audit oversight and regulatory cooperation.
This appears to be a general news update from CBI covering multiple financial services sectors and regulatory topics, so a low urgency classification is appropriate.
This regulatory update from the ECB appears to be a list of supervised entities, which is likely relevant for banks, asset managers, and wealth managers in terms of prudential requirements, reporting, and licensing. The lack of a detailed description suggests a medium level of urgency.
Periodic & ongoing disclosures Sustainable Finance Corporate sustainability reporting: AMF draws listed companies' attention to ESMA's 2025 recommendations
Why this matters
This regulatory update from the AMF (French financial markets authority) is relevant for listed companies, particularly those in the banking, investment management, and capital markets sectors.
This speech from the Bank of England discusses the Financial Policy Committee's mandate and the balance between financial stability and economic growth. It covers topics related to prudential requirements, operational resilience, and ESG, which are relevant for banks, asset managers, and wealth managers.
Given at central Bank of Ireland ninth annual workshop of the ESCB research cluster 2
Why this matters
This speech by a Bank of England official discusses trade challenges, which could impact banking, investment management, and wealth management firms from a prudential, operational, and ESG perspective.
PS17/25 establishes the **Matching Adjustment Investment Accelerator (MAIA) framework**, enabling PRA-regulated insurers to regularize and expand their use of matching adjustment (MA) in calculating capital requirements for certain long-duration insurance liabilities. This framework is significant because it provides a structured pathway for firms to optimize capital efficiency while maintaining prudential safeguards through exposure limits, eligibility assessments, and breach remediation mechanisms.
Key dates
27 October 2025
- PS17/25 final rules and policy material took effect; firms could begin applying for MAIA permission
31 December 2026 Deadline
- Implementation deadline for changes to MALIR reporting template
18 weeks after financial year Deadline
end; - Annual MAIA use report submission deadline (ongoing, annually)
2 months from breach identification Deadline
- Deadline to rectify breaches to avoid MA benefit reduction
Suggested considerations
*Immediate (Q4 2025 - Q1 2026):
*Assess eligibility for MAIA permission by reviewing current MA portfolio and prospective assets
*Establish contingency plans for scenarios where MAIA assets become ineligible
*Prepare MAIA permission application if pursuing the framework
What changed
The MAIA framework introduces the following regulatory requirements:
Permission and Eligibility Framework
Firms must obtain explicit MAIA permission from the PRA to use the accelerator
Permission grants authority to regularize previously non-compliant MA assets and apply MA to new eligible assets within defined parameters
Exposure Limits
Firms receive fixed monetary exposure limits calibrated using the Best Estimate of Liabilities (BEL) of the MA portfolio, net of reinsurance, at the time of permission grant
Limits remain fixed until the next formal variation of MAIA permission
Asset Eligibility and Assessment
Basel III risk-based capital ratios increase while leverage ratio and Net Stable Funding Ratio remain stable for large internationally active banks.
Why this matters
This is a Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) quantitative impact study (QIS) monitoring report on Basel III framework implementation as of end-December 2024.
This speech by the BoE's Sam Woods covers topics relevant to banking, investment management, and wealth management firms, including prudential requirements, operational resilience, and technology/cyber risks. The content appears to be informational rather than an urgent regulatory update.
Das Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft (SECO) hat eine Änderung der Verordnung vom 21. März 2025 über Massnahmen gegenüber Personen und Organisationen, die mit den Organisationen ISIL (Da'esh) und Al-Kaida in Verbindung stehen (SR 946.231.08) publiziert.
Why this matters
This regulatory update from FINMA relates to sanctions measures against individuals and organizations associated with ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida. This impacts banking, investment management, and wealth management firms that need to comply with sanctions requirements.
UnauthorizedThis firm may be providing or promoting financial services or products without our permission. You should avoid dealing with this firm and beware of scams. Almost all firms and individuals must be authorised or registered by us to carry out or promote financial services in the UK. This firm is not…
Why this matters
The update is a clone-firm warning issued by the FCA identifying Raliplen as an unauthorised entity operating without permission. It provides contact details, website URLs, and standard protective guidance for consumers.
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF hat eine Änderung des Anhangs der Verordnung vom 16. Dezember 2022 über Massnahmen betreffend Haiti publiziert.
AI Analysis
The Swiss Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research (WBF, under which SECO operates) has published an update to the Annex of the Ordinance of 16 December 2022 on measures concerning Haiti, reflecting UN Security Council amendments to the sanctions list. This matters for Swiss financial institutions as it triggers immediate asset freeze checks and reporting obligations to ensure compliance with Switzerland's implementation of UN sanctions via FINMA and SECO oversight, avoiding enforcement risks amid Haiti's ongoing instability. The update aligns with global renewals of Haiti sanctions, emphasizing asset freezes on newly designated individuals and entities involved in destabilizing activities.
Key dates
18 October 2024
- UN Security Council Resolution 2752 adopted, expanding arms embargo (basis for Swiss/UK updates)
20 March 2025
- Canadian amendments add 3 individuals (related context)
Immediate (publication date: 21 October 2025) Deadline
- Swiss firms must check accounts, freeze assets or economic resources of newly listed persons without prior notice, and report to SECO/FINMA without delay
23 July 2025
- UK Haiti Sanctions Amendment Regulations enter force, reflecting similar UN changes
17
20 October 2025; - UNSC renews regime for one year, adds 2 entries to sanctions list (UK/Jersey notices align with Swiss publication)
Suggested considerations
Screening and Freezing: Immediately review client databases, accounts, and holdings against the updated SECO Haiti sanctions list; freeze funds/economic resources of designated persons/entities without notice or delay; do not deal with or make available such assets indirectly.
Reporting: Notify SECO (via [email protected] or portal) and FINMA of matches, providing details on frozen assets; report any additional compliance-facilitating information.
Ongoing Monitoring: Update transaction screening systems for expanded arms embargo prohibitions (e.g., no financial services for military goods/technology to Haiti-connected persons); cease brokering or technical assistance if applicable.
Licensing Checks: Refrain from activities unless licensed by competent authorities (e.g., SECO for exemptions).
Documentation: Maintain records of checks and actions for audits; train staff on updated definitions (e.g., "military goods," "connected with Haiti").
What changed
- Amendment to the Annex of the Verordnung vom 16. Dezember 2022 über Massnahmen betreffend Haiti, incorporating UN Security Council updates to the sanctions list, likely adding individuals,...
Reflects broader UN measures, including renewal of travel bans, asset freezes, and arms embargoes; expansion of arms embargo scope to military goods, technology, technical assistance, financial...
Switzerland implements via SECO's sanction ordinances, with FINMA enforcing for supervised entities; parallels international updates like UN Resolution 2752 (2024) and 2794 (2025), which reintroduce...
Compliance impact
Urgency: High - Immediate asset freeze and reporting requirements carry criminal penalties for non-compliance (e.g., aligned with UK fines up to updated monetary levels); failure risks FINMA enforcement, reputational damage, and misalignment with UN obligations amid Haiti's volatile security. Matters due to expanded scope capturing indirect financial facilitation, increasing false positive screening burdens for firms with Haiti exposure.
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF hat eine Änderung des Anhangs der Verordnung vom 24. Juni 2020 über Massnahmen gegenüber Nicaragua (SR 946.231.158.5) publiziert.
AI Analysis
The Swiss Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research (WBF/EAER) amended the annex of the Ordinance on Measures against Nicaragua (SR 946.231.158.5) on 20 October 2025, modifying entries for two individuals, with measures entering into force immediately thereafter. This update requires Swiss financial intermediaries to promptly screen and adjust sanctions compliance programs to reflect the revised designations, ensuring no prohibited dealings with the updated list. It matters because failure to implement could trigger FINMA enforcement, asset blocking obligations, and reporting requirements under Switzerland's Embargo Act (EmbG).
Key dates
20 October 2025
- Amendment to the annex published by WBF/EAER
21 October 2025
- FINMA publishes updated sanctions notice and notifies via MyFINMA
21 October 2025, 11:00 pm
- Measures enter into force; immediate blocking and screening obligations apply
Suggested considerations
Block and report: Freeze any newly or modifiedly sanctioned assets; report to FINMA/SECO via MyFINMA if matches found.
Update compliance systems: Integrate the annex changes into screening tools, policies, and training; conduct risk assessments for Nicaragua exposure.
Monitor ongoing: Subscribe to FINMA news (https://www.finma.ch/en/news/) and SECO updates for further deltas.
Document implementation to demonstrate due diligence in case of FINMA audits.
What changed
- Modification of entries for two individuals in the annex of the Ordinance on Measures against Nicaragua (SR 946.231.158.5), likely involving updates to personal details, aliases, or sanction...
These changes align with ongoing maintenance of the sanctions list, originally imposed in June 2020 due to human rights, democracy, and rule-of-law concerns in Nicaragua, mirroring EU measures from...
No broader structural changes to the ordinance itself; this is a targeted annex update, similar to frequent "delta" amendments published by SECO.
Compliance impact
Urgency: High – Immediate effect from 21 October 2025 demands swift action to avoid violations, as asset freezing is retroactive and non-compliance risks FINMA enforcement (e.g., fines, license restrictions). This matters amid frequent 2025 sanctions updates (e.g., 10+ Nicaragua/Myanmar deltas), heightening operational burden and geopolitical risk exposure in FINMA's 2025 Risk Monitor.
Am 20. Oktober 2025 hat das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF die Liste der in diesem Kontext sanktionierten Personen, Unternehmen und Organisationen geändert. Das WBF hat die für die Schweiz massgebliche Sanktionsdatenbank SESAM (SECO Sanctions Management) angepasst und die…
AI Analysis
This FINMA publication notifies Swiss financial intermediaries of updates to the Swiss sanctions list against the Islamic Republic of Iran, as amended by the Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research (WBF) on October 20, 2025, via the SESAM sanctions database. It matters because financial firms must immediately screen clients, freeze assets, and report matches to comply with Swiss sanction ordinances, amid escalating global Iran sanctions following UN snapback mechanisms. Failure to act risks enforcement by FINMA or SECO.
Key dates
21 October 2025, 23:00 Uhr
- Changes enter into force, binding on all Swiss financial intermediaries
29 September 2025
- Triggering UN snapback sanctions on Iran reinstated (contextual lead-in). https://www.mrllp.com/news-item/monthly-sanctions-update-october-2025/
20 October 2025
- WBF amends SESAM database and publishes urgent update on its website
12 December 2025
- Swiss Federal Council expands Iran Ordinance, adding humanitarian exceptions and authorization grounds. https://sanctionsnews.bakermckenzie.com/swiss-government-significantly-expands-sanctions-against-iran/
Suggested considerations
Immediate screening: Run full client and transaction screening against updated SESAM list via SECO's website or integrated tools.
Asset freeze: Block any funds, assets, or economic resources of newly listed parties without delay; report freezes to SECO within specified timelines (typically 30 days).
Transaction blocks and reporting: Halt prohibited dealings; file suspicious activity reports (SARs) to Money Laundering Reporting Office Switzerland (MROS) if Iran exposure suspected.
Due diligence enhancement: Review existing Iran-related exposures, especially shadow banking, oil/petroleum networks, or IRGC-linked entities; update risk assessments.
Internal controls: Ensure automated screening tools are synced with SESAM by effective date; train staff on updates.
What changed
The core change is the WBF's amendment to the SESAM (SECO Sanctions Management) database, updating the list of sanctioned persons, companies, and organizations related to Iran sanctions. This aligns with the Swiss Iran Ordinance and reflects broader international reimposition of UN sanctions via the JCPOA snapback mechanism triggered in late September 2025. No new Swiss-specific requirements are introduced beyond standard implementation of the updated list, but it emphasizes urgent publication and binding effect under existing ordinances.
Compliance impact
Urgency: High - Effective immediately (post-21 Oct 2025), with today's date (Jan 2026) indicating firms had ~3 months to implement but must verify ongoing compliance amid further expansions (e.g., Dec 2025). Matters due to FINMA's strict enforcement history on sanctions (e.g., independent freezing measures), potential fines up to CHF 500k+, reputational risk, and alignment with global escalation (UN/UK/US/EU actions adding 100s of designations). Non-compliance exposes firms to audits, license risks.
Given at the Bank of England and Bank for International Settlements Innovation Hub’s DLT Innovation Challenge Showcase
Why this matters
This speech from the Bank of England discusses the use of central bank digital money for the future of payments, which is relevant for banks, fintechs, crypto firms, and payment providers. It touches on technology, operational resilience, and regulatory authorization issues.
21 OCT 2025, 09:33 AM
The DFSA publishes summary of Consultation Paper 168 – Enhancements to the…
Why this matters
The regulatory update from the DFSA outlines proposed enhancements to the regulatory framework for crypto tokens, which is relevant for crypto exchanges and fintech firms operating in the Dubai International Financial Centre.
This regulatory update from the Bank of England covers topics related to Islamic finance and the Alternative Liquidity Facility, which are relevant for banking, investment management, and wealth management firms.
Savings protection Warning Other professionals Executive & other private individuals Retail investors Professional investors Journalists Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers The AMF has...
AI Analysis
The AMF enforced a trading suspension on MEXEDIA S.p.A. shares on Euronext from 11 September 2025 to 30 September 2025 due to indicators of **pump and dump** market abuse, urging investors to exercise extreme caution against unauthorized high-upside recommendations. This enforcement action underscores the AMF's proactive market surveillance and highlights ongoing risks of manipulative practices in listed equities, serving as a reminder for firms to bolster internal controls against such schemes. Compliance teams should note this as a signal of heightened regulatory scrutiny on price manipulation, potentially informing future enforcement trends.
Key dates
11 September 2025
- Trading suspension in MEXEDIA shares effective at end of session
12 September 2025
- AMF press release published (French version)
30 September 2025
- Scheduled end of suspension period (inclusive)
1 October 2025
- Resumption of trading confirmed; pre-suspension orders purged
Suggested considerations
Trading venues (e.g., Euronext): Immediately implement and maintain suspensions upon AMF request; purge affected orders.
Investment firms and brokers: Screen for and block client orders in suspended securities; monitor for pump-and-dump indicators in communications.
All surveilled firms: Enhance transaction surveillance for manipulation signals (e.g., unusual volume/price spikes); report suspicions to AMF.
Investors and firms assisting them: Retain evidence of suspicious pitches (screenshots, emails) and submit to AMF via Epargne Info Service (https://www.amf-france.org/en/request-information or +33(0)1 53 45 62 00).
What changed
This is an enforcement action rather than new regulatory changes; no legislative or rule amendments are introduced. Key elements include:
AMF's invocation of financial markets and market abuse regulations to mandate trading suspension via Euronext.
Explicit warning on pump and dump tactics, defined as unauthorized promotions inflating share prices for insider sales, leading to investor losses.
Follow-up resumption of trading on 1 October 2025 after suspension ended, with continued vigilance calls.
Compliance impact
Urgency: Medium - This is a resolved, case-specific enforcement (suspension lifted 1 October 2025), not imposing new firm-wide rules, reducing immediate action needs as of January 2026. It matters for market abuse surveillance programs, signaling AMF's focus on pump-and-dump in equities, which could elevate fines or scrutiny in audits; firms should review systems for similar indicators to mitigate risks in ongoing operations.
Financial disclosures & corporate financing Public offer Prospectus Executive & other private individuals Professional investors Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF announces new measures to facilitate access to listing
Why this matters
This regulatory update from the AMF announces new measures to facilitate access to listing, which impacts banking, capital markets, and listed companies. The key topics covered are authorization and licensing, reporting and disclosure, and market abuse/surveillance, which are relevant for banks, broker-dealers, and...
Deutsche Bank Wealth Management (CLONE) / Deutsche Bank AG (CLONE) / DB UK Bank Limited (CLONE) - Central Bank of Ireland Issues Warning on Unauthorised Firm
Why this matters
This is a warning from the Central Bank of Ireland about an unauthorized firm impersonating legitimate Deutsche Bank entities and offering unauthorized banking and investment services. This poses a high risk to consumers and requires prompt action.
20 OCT 2025, 10:00 AM
Dubai advances position as Middle East, Africa and South Asia’s leading global…
Why this matters
The regulatory update highlights Dubai's continued growth as a leading global financial center, with significant expansion in the number of registered companies, regulated entities, and banking assets under management.
Publication from the Bank, PRA and FCA to firms and financial market infrastructures highlighting observed effective practices of cyber response and recovery capabilities.
Why this matters
This regulatory update from the PRA, Bank of England, and FCA focuses on effective practices for cyber response and recovery capabilities, which is highly relevant for firms across the banking, payments, and technology sectors.
Given at the Group of Thirty’s 40th International Banking Seminar 2025, Washington DC
Why this matters
This speech by the Bank of England Governor covers the global economic outlook, which is relevant for banking, investment management, and wealth management firms.
Das Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft (SECO) hat eine Änderung der Verordnung vom 21. März 2025 über Massnahmen gegenüber Personen und Organisationen, die mit den Organisationen ISIL (Da'esh) und Al-Kaida in Verbindung stehen (SR 946.231.08) publiziert.
Why this matters
This regulatory update from FINMA relates to sanctions measures against individuals and organizations associated with ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida. This impacts banking, investment management, and wealth management firms that need to comply with sanctions requirements.
Warning Savings protection Warning Forex and binary options The AMF and the ACPR warn the public against the activities of several entities offering in France investments in the unregulated foreign exchange market (Forex) and in crypto-assets derivatives without being authorized to do so
Why this matters
This regulatory update warns the public against unauthorized entities offering investments in the unregulated foreign exchange (Forex) market and crypto-asset derivatives in France.
Speech at the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales annual conference Thriving in Transformation, London
Why this matters
This speech by the Bank of England's Chief Economist Huw Pill discusses the evolving UK monetary policy landscape, which is relevant for banking, investment management, and wealth management firms. It covers topics related to prudential requirements, operational resilience, and the broader macroeconomic environment.
The PRA has published LIAC02/25, a consultation on proposed low impact amendments to rules and policy.
AI Analysis
The PRA's LIAC02/25 consultation, published on 16 October 2025, proposes low-impact amendments to its Rulebook and policy materials, including technical fixes, conditional disapplications, and miscellaneous corrections to enhance accuracy and align with prior policies. These changes matter for PRA-regulated firms as they ensure regulatory consistency with minimal operational burden, with most taking effect in late 2025 or early 2026 following the consultation period.
Suggested considerations
Submit consultation responses by 13 November 2025 via the PRA's Low Impact Amendments Process page, focusing on proposed disapplications, TMTP formula, ISPV rules, and miscellaneous changes.
Review and update internal policies for TMTP calculations to adopt the new 'Wr' formula from 31 December 2025 year-end, without restating priors.
Confirm compliance with ISPV 'no co-mingling' clarifications and SS2/25 updates by 23 December 2025.
Verify Rulebook references (e.g., Securitisation, parent undertakings) and adjust systems for effective dates like 19 January 2026.
For friendly societies/credit unions: Note zero minimum fees already reflected in 2025/26 invoices; no further action needed.
What changed
The main proposals include:
Conditional disapplication of PRA General Provisions to implement deference arrangements under the UK-Swiss Berne Financial Services Agreement.
Amendment to Transitional Measure on Technical Provisions (TMTP) Part, Rule 5.2, introducing a new formula for 'Wr' effective 31 December 2025, using existing 'Wq' values without retrospective...
Amendment to Insurance Special Purpose Vehicle (ISPV) Part, Solvency Requirements Rule 2.2A(3), clarifying the 'no co-mingling' requirement, effective 23 December 2025, alongside updates to SS2/25.
Miscellaneous amendments to the PRA Rulebook, such as glossary updates, fundamental rules, general provisions, interpretation, notifications, and policyholder protection parts.
Amendments made...
Compliance impact
Urgency: Low – These are explicitly "low impact" technical, typographical, and alignment amendments with no material capital, reporting, or operational shifts expected; many stem from prior consultations (e.g., CP8/25, CP12/23, PS10/25) and avoid retrospective changes. Firms should act promptly on response deadlines and upcoming effectives (e.g., December 2025) to prevent minor non-compliance, but resource allocation can be minimal given the non-substantive nature.
The PRA has published LIAF02/25, a collection of final low impact rule amendments.
Why this matters
This is a regulatory update from the PRA on low impact rule amendments, which is likely to be of interest to banking, investment management, and wealth management firms from a prudential, operational resilience, and reporting perspective.
15 OCT 2025, 03:05 PM
Live from GITEX: DFSA and VARA strengthen regulatory cooperation to support…
Why this matters
This regulatory update announces a memorandum of understanding (MoU) between the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) and the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) to enhance cooperation and collaboration in regulating the virtual asset sector in Dubai.
Based on remarks given on the ‘Real World Assets Tokenisation: What Asset Classes Will Work – and Which Won’t’ panel at DC Fintech Week 2025
Why this matters
This speech discusses the tokenization of real-world assets, which impacts banking, capital markets, and crypto/digital asset firms. Key topics include prudential requirements, technology, and licensing for firms engaging in this activity.
Supervision Asset management Governance Journalists Investment management companies The Autorité des Marchés Financiers publishes the findings of its thematic inspections on governance and role of senior managers at asset management companies
Why this matters
This regulatory update from the AMF focuses on thematic inspections related to governance and the role of senior managers at asset management companies, which are relevant for investment management and wealth management firms.
The PRA and FCA have today confirmed plans to increase flexibility around senior banker pay, alongside changes to create better links between bonus awards and responsible risk-taking.
Why this matters
This regulatory update from the PRA and FCA impacts the banking and wealth management sectors, with changes to senior banker pay and bonus structures related to prudential requirements, governance, and consumer protection. The medium urgency reflects the forward-looking nature of the changes for 2025.
PS21/25 implements reforms to PRA remuneration rules for banks, building societies, and PRA-designated investment firms, simplifying Material Risk Taker (MRT) identification, aligning deferral periods with international standards (4 years for non-SMF MRTs and 5 years for SMFs), and enhancing links to individual accountability under the Senior Managers Regime (SMR). These changes matter as they reduce regulatory burden, increase flexibility in bonus structures (e.g., marginal deferral rates and cash payments), and promote competitiveness while maintaining risk alignment, potentially reversing trends toward higher fixed pay.
Key dates
November 2024
Preceding joint consultation (CP16/24/PRA, CP24/23/FCA) closed prior to PS
15 October 2025
Publication date; some changes (e.g., deferral periods, pro-rata vesting) may apply to ongoing 2025 performance year and unvested prior awards at firm discretion
16 October 2025
Final rules and updated SS2/17 take effect; apply to performance years starting after this date (e.g., mandatory from 1 January 2026 for calendar-year firms)
Suggested considerations
Review and update MRT identification processes, applying simplified top 0.3% threshold and new proportionality exemptions.
Revise remuneration policies for deferral (4/5 years, marginal rates), upfront cash flexibility, and instrument expectations; update bonus award calculations.
Embed SMR-linked adjustments: Define criteria for chain-wide pay reductions on adverse outcomes; align Remuneration Committee oversight with PRA priorities and risk events.
For dual-regulated firms: Transition to PRA-cross-referenced FCA rules (SYSC 19D).
Optional early adoption for specified changes on 2025/unvested awards; document governance for RemCo approvals and board policies.
What changed
- MRT Identification: Simplified quantitative threshold to the top 0.3% of earners (assessed against risk impact); qualitative criteria unchanged; raised proportionality threshold for disapplying...
Deferral Periods: 4-year minimum for non-SMF MRTs (previously varied); reduced to 5 years for SMFs (from 7 years); aligns with FCA and international practice.
Deferral Rates: Marginal system—40% deferral on first £660,000 of variable remuneration, 60% above; replaces cliff-edge approach for proportionality.
Upfront Cash Flexibility: Removed equal cash/instrument split requirement (Remuneration 15.16 deleted); deferred portion should have higher instrument share as good practice (new SS2/17 para 5.44B);...
Individual Accountability: New rules/expectations for adjusting remuneration up the management chain for adverse outcomes; senior management accountable against PRA priorities; Remuneration...
Compliance impact
Urgency: High – Mandatory from performance years post-16 October 2025 (e.g., 2026 for most), with immediate opt-in possible; impacts 2026 bonus cycles, requiring swift policy rewrites amid year-end planning. Matters due to simplified but ownership-heavy MRT processes, SMR-pay linkages raising accountability risks, and flexibility needing robust justification to avoid supervisory challenge; non-compliance risks enforcement under PRA accountability regimes.
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA takes note of the Federal Administrative Court’s partial decision concerning the write-down of AT1 capital instruments. FINMA will contest the judgment of 1 October 2025 and appeal to the Federal Supreme Court.
Why this matters
This regulatory update from FINMA concerns the write-down of AT1 capital instruments, which is a key prudential requirement for banks. The fact that FINMA is appealing the court's decision indicates this is an important issue for the banking sector.
This speech by the Bank of England covers topics relevant to banking, investment management, and wealth management firms, including AML/financial crime, prudential requirements, and operational resilience. The content appears to be informational rather than an urgent regulatory update.
13 OCT 2025, 09:43 AM
DFSA Connect: new digital services streamline regulatory approvals processes,…
Why this matters
This regulatory update from the DFSA announces the launch of a new digital platform called DFSA Connect, which is designed to streamline the application and approval processes for firms seeking authorization to conduct financial services in the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC).
Das Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft (SECO) hat eine Änderung der Verordnung vom 21. März 2025 über Massnahmen gegenüber Personen und Organisationen, die mit den Organisationen ISIL (Da'esh) und Al-Kaida in Verbindung stehen (SR 946.231.08) publiziert.
Why this matters
This regulatory update from FINMA relates to sanctions measures against individuals and organizations associated with ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida. This is relevant for banks, wealth managers, and other financial firms that need to comply with sanctions regulations.
Warning Warning Crypto-assets Savings protection Crypto-assets: the Autorité des Marchés Financiers warns the public about the activities of several unauthorized entities
Why this matters
This is a warning from the French financial regulator about unauthorized entities operating in the crypto-asset space, which relates to consumer protection and licensing requirements for crypto firms.
The Securities Lending Committee is a forum for market participants and authorities to discuss the UK securities lending market.
Why this matters
This regulatory update discusses the Securities Lending Committee, which is a forum for market participants and authorities to discuss the UK securities lending market. This is relevant for banking, capital markets, and investment management firms that engage in securities lending activities.
09 OCT 2025, 12:00 PM
DFSA and HKMA to co-host second Climate Finance Conference to strengthen…
Why this matters
The regulatory update is an informational announcement about a conference on climate finance, with no specific regulatory changes or requirements mentioned. It is therefore classified as informational content with low urgency.
PS16/25 is the PRA's policy statement restating firm-facing organisational requirements from the MiFID Org Reg (e.g., outsourcing, record-keeping, risk management, compliance, internal audit, and governance) into the PRA Rulebook, with no material changes, to align with HMT's revocation of the EU regulation under FSMA 2023. This matters because it ensures continuity of prudential oversight for PRA-authorised firms post-revocation, preventing enforcement gaps in systems and controls while adapting provisions (e.g., supervisory function) to UK governance structures.
Key dates
9 October 2025
- PRA publishes PS16/25 with final rules and feedback to CP9/25 consultation
23 October 2025
- New PRA rules and technical standards come into force, coinciding with HMT's anticipated revocation of MiFID Org Reg via commencement order (FCA rules align on same date)
Prior to 23 October 2025
- HMT expected to lay second Statutory Instrument revoking remaining MiFID Org Reg provisions; PRA may delay/revoke rules if not made
Suggested considerations
Review and map existing MiFID Org Reg compliance processes against restated PRA Rulebook provisions (e.g., update policies on outsourcing, risk management, governance).
Confirm governing body oversight aligns with adapted Article 25 requirements; document any adjustments for UK structures.
Update internal references in algorithmic trading governance documents to new rule 2.2D.
Conduct gap analysis and training on minor clarifications; prepare for dual FCA/PRA alignment if applicable.
Monitor HMT commencement order; if delayed, reassess implementation plans.
What changed
- Restatement of requirements: Provisions from MiFID Org Reg Articles on outsourcing, record-keeping, control procedures, risk management, compliance, internal audit, and governance are transferred...
Supervisory function adjustment: Following consultation feedback, PRA retained Article 25 provisions but substituted "governing body" for "supervisory function" to fit UK firm structures, preserving...
Technical standards update: Minor amendment to algorithmic trading technical standards, replacing references to revoked MiFID Org Reg Article 23(2) with new PRA Rulebook rule 2.2D.
No policy or scope changes; adjustments mainly reflect PRA drafting style and respond to feedback for clarity.
Compliance impact
Urgency: High – Firms must act promptly as rules take effect on 23 October 2025 (past deadline as of current date), with no transition period; non-compliance risks enforcement gaps in core systems/controls post-revocation. Impact is low for substance (restatement only) but requires documentation updates to avoid supervisory scrutiny, especially for governance and outsourcing.
This speech by a Bank of England official discusses the consumption gap, which is relevant to banking, investment management, and wealth management firms in terms of consumer protection, prudential requirements, and reporting. The content is informational rather than urgent regulatory action.
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA today published guidance on the extension of the transitional period for exchange of collateral in certain OTC derivatives transactions. The current transitional period runs until 1 January 2026 and will be extended by a further three years.
AI Analysis
FINMA extended the transitional period for collateral exchange requirements in non-centrally cleared OTC derivatives from January 1, 2026 to January 1, 2029, providing Swiss market participants with three additional years of relief from mandatory collateral posting obligations on certain equity derivatives. This extension aligns Swiss regulation with the EU's indefinite exemption introduced in December 2024, preventing competitive disadvantages for Swiss derivatives traders while a permanent regulatory framework is developed.
Key dates
October 9, 2025
- FINMA Guidance 04/2025 published and takes effect immediately
January 1, 2029
- New expiration date for the transitional period; collateral exchange obligations become mandatory unless further extended or a permanent framework is adopted
Suggested considerations
*Acknowledge the extended timeline: Update internal compliance calendars and risk management frameworks to reflect the January 1, 2029 deadline rather than January 1, 2026.
*Monitor FinMIA revision: Track ongoing legislative developments regarding the permanent regulatory framework for OTC derivatives to prepare for post-2029 compliance requirements.
*Assess competitive positioning: Evaluate whether the extended transitional period affects trading strategies, counterparty relationships, or market competitiveness relative to EU and UK peers.
What changed
The primary regulatory change is the extension of the transitional period under Article 131 paragraph 5bis of the Financial Market Infrastructure Ordinance (FinMIO). Specifically:
Previous deadline: January 1, 2026
New deadline: January 1, 2029
Scope: Applies to non-centrally cleared OTC derivatives transactions involving equity options, index options, and equity basket derivatives that are not cleared through a FINMA-authorized or...
Regulatory basis: FINMA Guidance 04/2025, issued October 9, 2025, under authority granted by Article 131 paragraph 6 FinMIO
The extension does not eliminate the collateral exchange obligation;...
Informs insurers on the issuance of the Response to Consultation Paper on Proposed Inclusion of Additional Criteria for Additional Tier 1 and Tier 2 Capital Instruments for Insurers.
AI Analysis
This MAS circular (ID 12/25) announces the Response to Consultation Paper on adding new criteria for insurers' Additional Tier 1 (AT1) and Tier 2 capital instruments under the RBC 2 framework, finalizing enhancements to strengthen capital quality and loss absorption. It matters because it directly updates Notices 133 and FHC-N133, impacting how insurers recognize capital instruments from 1 January 2026, with a restriction to non-retail investors in Singapore, aligning Singapore's regime with global standards like IAIS ICS.
Suggested considerations
Review Existing/Planned Issuances: Inventory AT1/Tier 2 instruments against new criteria; ensure compliance with non-retail investor restriction (e.g., verify distribution channels and investor classifications).
Update Capital Planning: Amend internal models and RBC 2 calculations per updated Notices 133/FHC-N133; test eligibility of instruments for loss absorption (e.g., callability, maturity ≥5 years for Tier 2).
Investor Documentation: Implement controls to confirm sales exclude Singapore retail investors; update prospectuses and distribution agreements.
Reporting & Disclosure: Integrate changes into valuation/capital reporting under RBC 2; seek MAS approval if needed for non-standard instruments.
Training & Governance: Train compliance/treasury teams; board oversight for capital planning impacts.
What changed
- Additional Criteria for AT1 and Tier 2 Instruments: Introduces new eligibility criteria for capital instruments to qualify as AT1 or Tier 2 under RBC 2, enhancing loss absorption features (e.g.,...
Investor Restriction: Instruments must be sold only to persons who are not retail investors in Singapore to qualify, reducing retail exposure risk.
Notice Amendments: Formalizes updates via ID 15/25, amending Notice 133 (for insurers) and Notice FHC-N133 (for Designated Financial Holding Companies), effective 1 January 2026.
These align with...
Compliance impact
Urgency: High – Effective 1 January 2026 (less than 1 month from today, 6 Feb 2026), requiring immediate review of issuances to avoid disqualification of capital, potential RBC shortfalls, or supervisory action. Matters for capital adequacy amid RBC 2 enhancements, as non-compliant instruments reduce eligible capital, increasing solvency risk; aligns with IAIS but adds local retail protection.
The Maxwell Fry Lecture of the Money, Macro and Finance Society given at the University of Birmingham
Why this matters
This speech from the Bank of England discusses uncertainty, structural change, and monetary policy strategy, which are relevant to banking, investment management, and wealth management firms.
This speech discusses how innovation is reshaping the financial system, covering topics related to new technologies, prudential requirements, and consumer protection - which are relevant for banks, fintechs, and crypto exchanges.
The Bank of England chairs the London Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee (FXJSC), which is a forum for discussion of the wholesale foreign exchange market. The FXJSC is made up of market participants, infrastructure providers and the UK financial regulators.
Why this matters
This regulatory update from the Bank of England covers the London Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee (FXJSC), which is a forum for discussion of the wholesale foreign exchange market. The update is likely relevant for banking, capital markets, and payments firms that participate in the foreign exchange market.
The Bank of England chairs the London Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee (FXJSC) Legal Sub-Committee. The FXJSC is made up of market participants, infrastructure providers and the UK financial regulators.
Why this matters
This regulatory update relates to the London Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee (FXJSC) Legal Sub-Committee, which involves market participants, infrastructure providers, and UK financial regulators.
The Bank of England chairs the London Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee (FXJSC) Operations Sub-Committee. The FXJSC is made up of market participants, infrastructure providers and the UK financial regulators.
Why this matters
This regulatory update relates to the operations of the London Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee, which involves market participants, infrastructure providers, and regulators in the banking, capital markets, and payments sectors.
Our Financial Policy Committee (FPC) meets to identify risks to financial stability and agree policy actions aimed at safeguarding the resilience of the UK financial system.
Why this matters
This regulatory update from the Bank of England's Financial Policy Committee covers key areas of focus for financial stability, including prudential requirements, operational resilience, and technology/cyber risks.
Not for distribution, directly or indirectly, in or into the United States, Canada, Australia, Japan or any other jurisdiction where it is unlawful to distribute this announcement.
Why this matters
This regulatory update from the Bank of England relates to foreign currency reserves, which is relevant for banking, investment management, and wealth management firms.
Sustainable Finance Periodic & ongoing disclosures Corporate sustainability reporting: AMF’s response to EFRAG’s consultation on the simplification of European standards
AI Analysis
The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF), France's financial markets regulator, responded to EFRAG's July 31, 2025, public consultation on simplified European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) under the CSRD, welcoming a 57% reduction in mandatory datapoints and 55% shorter standards while urging refinements in materiality, climate reporting, and financial effects disclosure. This matters for compliance professionals as it signals upcoming proportionate ESRS revisions that could ease reporting burdens for large listed companies starting voluntarily in 2026, enhancing investor usability without diluting key sustainability insights.
Key dates
July 31, 2025
- EFRAG publishes draft simplified ESRS for public consultation
September 29, 2025
- Consultation closes
End of November 2025
- EFRAG submits technical advice to European Commission
June 2026
- Sector-specific ESRS adoption planned
2026 financial year (reports in 2027)
- Voluntary application of simplified standards, if legislative timeline allows
Suggested considerations
Monitor EFRAG's post-consultation technical advice (end-November 2025) and EC adoption process; prepare for voluntary uptake in 2026 reporting cycles.
Listed companies: Refine materiality processes to specify IRO types and use gross impacts; retain "net zero" definitions in climate plans; prioritize quantitative climate financial effects.
Conduct or update materiality assessments per EFRAG guidance (e.g., value chain, thresholds); leverage "undue costs" relief judiciously with time limits.
Prepare xHTML digital tagging for sustainability statements in management reports.
French firms: Align 2026 statements with AMF supervisory expectations, noting non-adoption of ESMA's GLESI guidelines pending full CSRD transposition.
What changed
AMF endorses EFRAG's simplifications but proposes targeted adjustments:
Materiality assessment: Support for proportionate double materiality (impacts, risks, opportunities or IRO) but requires minimum specification of impact type (positive/negative, risk, opportunity);...
Climate reporting: Regrets removal of "net zero" definition (90-95% gross GHG reduction trajectory), essential for 2024 comparability.
Anticipated financial effects: Strongly backs Option 1 (quantitative info required, with exceptions) for climate matters to align with ISSB and investor needs; flexible for other topics.
Reporting reliefs: Supports "undue costs/efforts" exemptions (e.g., metrics except Scope 3 GHG) with time-bound limits to match ISSB.
EFRAG's draft cuts mandatory datapoints by 57-61%, eliminates...
Compliance impact
Urgency: Medium - Not immediate mandates, as this is a consultation response with voluntary 2026 start, but proactive preparation is essential for large listed firms facing AMF scrutiny on 2025/2026 statements. Matters due to potential burden reduction (57% fewer datapoints) balanced by AMF's push for investor-critical details like quantitative climate effects, aligning EU CSRD with global ISSB standards amid supervisory ramp-up.
This regulatory update discusses the CBDC Academic Advisory Group, which is relevant to banking, payments, and digital assets sectors. The topics covered include prudential requirements, technology, and licensing, which are important for firms in these sectors.
UnauthorizedThis firm may be providing or promoting financial services or products without our permission. You should avoid dealing with this firm and beware of scams. Almost all firms and individuals must be authorised or registered by us to carry out or promote financial services in the UK. This firm is not…
Why this matters
This is a standard FCA Warning List entry for an unauthorised firm (Ehamarkets) operating without permission. The content is informational and protective in nature, advising consumers to avoid the firm and explaining consequences of dealing with unauthorised entities (no FSCS/ombudsman protection).
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF hat eine Änderung des Anhangs der Verordnung über Massnahmen gegenüber Burundi (SR 946.231.121.8) publiziert.
AI Analysis
The Swiss Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research (WBF/DEFR) has updated the annex to the Ordinance on Measures against Burundi (SR 946.231.121.8), modifying the list of sanctioned persons, companies, and organizations in the SESAM database. This matters for Swiss financial institutions as it imposes immediate asset freeze and transaction restrictions, aligning with FINMA's heightened focus on sanctions risks amid geopolitical tensions.
Key dates
8 October 2025, 23:00 hours
- Changes enter into force; asset freezes and prohibitions apply immediately thereafter
6 October 2025
- DEFR modifies the sanctions list and updates SESAM database
Suggested considerations
Screen clients, transactions, and assets against the updated SESAM database immediately upon effectiveness (post-8 October 2025, 23:00).
Freeze assets of newly listed or modified sanctioned parties without prior notice and report to SECO/FINMA via MyFINMA notification system.
Cease any direct or indirect provision of funds/economic resources to sanctioned parties; conduct retrospective reviews of existing relationships for Burundi exposure.
Update internal sanctions screening tools, policies, and staff training to reflect SESAM changes; document compliance efforts for potential FINMA audits.
What changed
- Modification to the list of sanctioned individuals, enterprises, and organizations under the Burundi sanctions ordinance.
Update published in the SECO Sanctions Management (SESAM) database, which is the authoritative Swiss reference for sanctions compliance.
No details on specific additions, deletions, or alterations to designations are provided in the publication summary, but changes trigger mandatory screening and blocking obligations.
Compliance impact
Urgency: High - Immediate effectiveness (8 October 2025) requires swift database rescreening to avoid violations, with FINMA emphasizing sanctions evasion risks in its 2025 Risk Monitor amid geopolitical shifts; non-compliance risks enforcement actions, fines, or reputational damage.
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung (WBF) hat eine Änderung des Anhangs 1 der Verordnung vom 1. Juni 2012 über Massnahmen gegenüber Guinea-Bissau (SR 946.231.138.3) publiziert.
AI Analysis
The Swiss Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research (WBF) published an amendment to Annex 1 of the Ordinance on Measures against Guinea-Bissau (SR 946.231.138.3) on October 7, 2025, updating the sanctions list maintained in the SESAM database. This change, effective October 8, 2025, requires Swiss financial intermediaries to immediately screen clients, freeze assets of listed individuals, and report to SECO, reinforcing compliance with UN Security Council Resolution 2048 (2012) and EU measures following the 2012 military coup. It matters for preventing sanctions evasion and ensuring adherence to Switzerland's Embargogesetz (EmbG), with non-compliance risking FINMA enforcement.
Key dates
October 8, 2025, 23:00 Uhr Deadline
- Changes enter into force; immediate implementation required for asset freezes and prohibitions
October 6, 2025
- WBF adjusts SESAM database and publishes changes on its website
October 7, 2025
- FINMA publishes the sanctions notice
Suggested considerations
Screen customer relationships against the updated SESAM list immediately upon effectiveness using heightened due diligence per GwG Art. 6.
Freeze assets of any matched listed persons/entities and prohibit new business.
Report affected relationships to SECO without delay; conduct additional checks and file SARs with MROS if suspicions remain.
Update internal sanctions screening systems and monitor MyFINMA for FINMA notifications.
Document compliance actions to demonstrate adherence in audits or FINMA inquiries.
What changed
- Amendment to Annex 1 of the Ordinance dated June 1, 2012, on measures against Guinea-Bissau, as published by WBF on October 6, 2025, and reflected in FINMA's announcement on October 7, 2025.
Updates to the SESAM (SECO Sanctions Management) database, which is the authoritative Swiss sanctions list; specific details on additions, deletions, or modifications to listed natural persons (e.g.,...
Prohibition on dealings with listed persons/entities; mandatory asset freeze and reporting obligations under the ordinance and Geldwäschereigesetz (GwG).
Compliance impact
Urgency: High - Immediate asset freeze and reporting are mandatory from October 8, 2025, with violations exposing firms to FINMA fines, reputational damage, or criminal liability under EmbG and GwG. This update underscores ongoing list volatility (e.g., similar 2024 change), demanding robust real-time screening to avoid inadvertent breaches in low-volume Guinea-Bissau exposures.
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF hat eine Änderung des Anhangs 7 der Verordnung vom 8. Juni 2012 über Massnahmen gegenüber Syrien (SR 946.231.172.7) publiziert.
AI Analysis
The Swiss Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research (WBF) updated Annex 7 of the Ordinance on Measures against Syria (SR 946.231.172.7) on October 6, 2025, modifying the list of sanctioned persons, companies, and organizations, effective October 8, 2025. This change requires Swiss financial intermediaries to immediately implement asset freezes and report affected relationships to SECO, amid broader Swiss alignment with EU and US easing of Syria sanctions earlier in 2025. It matters for compliance as it mandates swift screening updates to avoid violations of ongoing targeted financial sanctions.
Key dates
October 8, 2025 at 23:00
- Changes enter into force; asset freezes and prohibitions apply immediately
October 6, 2025
- WBF publishes update to Annex 7 and SESAM database
Suggested considerations
Screen client portfolios, accounts, and transactions against the updated SESAM database immediately upon effectiveness.
Freeze assets of newly listed or affected sanctioned parties and implement transaction prohibitions.
Report all impacted business relationships to SECO promptly.
Conduct GwG due diligence (Art. 6) on any suspicions; file with Money Laundering Reporting Office (Art. 9 GwG) if unresolved.
Update internal sanctions screening systems and train staff on changes; retain evidence of compliance for audits.
What changed
- The WBF amended the list of sanctioned entities in Annex 7 of SR 946.231.172.7, updating the SESAM sanctions database (SECO Sanctions Management).
Financial intermediaries must enforce prohibitions, freeze assets of listed parties, and report business relationships to SECO.
Reporting to SECO does not exempt intermediaries from conducting due diligence under Art. 6 GwG (Anti-Money Laundering Act) and filing suspicions with the Money Laundering Reporting Office under Art.
Compliance impact
Urgency: High - Immediate asset freeze and reporting obligations take effect October 8, 2025, with non-compliance risking FINMA enforcement, fines, or criminal liability under sanctions laws. This matters as it occurs against a backdrop of Syria sanctions easing (e.g., Swiss economic sanctions lifted June 20, 2025; EU measures May 27, 2025), heightening risk of oversight on residual targeted lists amid increased Syria-related flows.
Given at the Scotland Global Investment Summit 2025
Why this matters
This speech by the BoE Governor covers investment in Scotland, which is relevant to banking, investment management, and wealth management firms. The key topics discussed are likely prudential requirements, ESG, and authorization/licensing, which are important for firms operating in these sectors.
Survey on the amount of covered deposits held on 30 September 2025
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF-CPDI 25/47 mandates a regular survey by Luxembourg credit institutions on the amount of covered deposits as of **30 September 2025**, focusing on eligible and covered deposits under the Law of 18 December 2015 on deposit guarantee schemes. It matters because it ensures accurate reporting to the Conseil de protection des déposants et des investisseurs (CPDI) for FGDL (Fonds de garantie des dépôts Luxembourg) compliance, with detailed field-by-field instructions for complex accounts like omnibus and trusts.
Key dates
30 September 2025
- Reference date for snapshot of deposits, eligible deposits, and covered deposits
6 October 2025
- Publication date of the circular by CSSF
Suggested considerations
Collect data on total deposits (field 0100), apply exclusions per Article 172 (field 0201), calculate covered deposits up to €100,000 limit (field 0300), and break down by natural/legal persons, balance thresholds, and special accounts (fields 0210-0330).
For omnibus/trust accounts, obtain and report shares of identifiable entitled persons, apportion by legal status of holder, and ensure fields like 0226 and 0255 reconcile.
Exclude non-creditor accounts or those assimilated to financial institutions/life insurance.
What changed
This circular updates prior guidance (notably CSSF-CPDI 16/02 as amended by CSSF-CPDI 23/35) by specifying the survey reference date of 30 September 2025 and providing granular reporting fields for eligible deposits (e.g., exclusions for financial institution-like structures and life insurance products), covered deposits capped at €100,000 per person, and breakdowns by natural/legal persons, including shares in omnibus accounts, fiduciaries, trusts, sub-accounts, and segregated accounts.
Compliance impact
Urgency: Medium – Past reference date (30 September 2025) as of January 2026 means non-reporting firms risk immediate FGDL non-compliance, fines, or supervisory action from CSSF, but this is a routine quarterly survey (see related Circular CSSF-CPDI 25/49 for December 2025). Matters for prudential reporting accuracy, especially amid EU deposit guarantee harmonization.
This speech by the BoE Governor discusses challenges to financial stability, covering topics such as prudential requirements, operational resilience, and ESG. It is relevant for banks, asset managers, and broker-dealers.
Stress-testing Markets Asset management Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies The Banque de France, the ACPR and the AMF launch a first system-wide stress test on interconnections within the financial system
Why this matters
This regulatory update announces a system-wide stress test on interconnections within the financial system, which is relevant for banks, asset managers, and broker-dealers. It covers prudential requirements, operational resilience, and reporting, indicating medium urgency for firms in the affected sectors.
This press release from the CSSF provides an update on the global situation of undertakings for collective investment at the end of August 2025, which is relevant for investment management and wealth management firms.
The PRA Regulatory Digest is for people working in the UK financial services industry and highlights key regulatory news and publications delivered for the month.
Why this matters
This is a general regulatory digest covering key updates across multiple sectors and topics relevant to UK financial services firms. The low urgency reflects the informational nature of the content.
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF hat Änderungen des Anhangs 8 der Verordnung vom 4. März 2022 über Massnahmen im Zusammenhang mit der Situation in der Ukraine (SR 946.231.176.72) publiziert.
AI Analysis
The publication announces updates by the Swiss Federal Department for Economic Affairs, Education and Research (WBF) to Annex 8 of the Ordinance on Measures in Connection with the Situation in Ukraine (SR 946.231.176.72), aligning Swiss sanctions against Russia with ongoing international restrictions. This matters for Swiss financial intermediaries as it imposes immediate obligations to block assets, report relationships, and conduct AML checks, amid escalating sanctions that heighten compliance risks and enforcement scrutiny from FINMA.
Suggested considerations
Screen and freeze assets: Immediately identify and block assets of newly sanctioned persons/entities per updated annexes; do not release without authorization.
Report to SECO: Notify SECO of all affected business relationships without delay.
Conduct AML due diligence: Perform additional clarifications under Art. 6 GwG (Anti-Money Laundering Act) on suspicions; file suspicious activity reports (SARs) with the Money Laundering Reporting Office Switzerland (MROS) under Art. 9 GwG if unresolved—SECO reporting does not substitute this.
Review transactions: Halt prohibited activities (e.g., payments to/from listed banks, exports of controlled goods, RDIF investments); update screening tools and client onboarding processes.
Document compliance: Maintain records of screenings, blocks, and reports for FINMA audits.
What changed
- Amendments to Annexes 8, 14, 15b, and 33 of the Ordinance, though specific details on new listings or prohibitions are not detailed in the announcement.
Continuation of standard requirements: Implement prohibitions, freeze assets of sanctioned persons, and report affected business relationships to SECO (State Secretariat for Economic Affairs).
These updates follow a pattern of prior changes, such as expanded export bans on dual-use goods (e.g., chrome ore, chemicals), transaction bans on additional Russian banks, and prohibitions on...
Compliance impact
Urgency: Critical – Effective immediately at 23:00 on January 13, 2026, with no grace period, this demands urgent system updates, screenings, and reporting to avoid FINMA enforcement (e.g., fines, licenses at risk). It amplifies AML / Financial Crime risks in a high-scrutiny environment, as FINMA's Risikomonitor 2025 highlights Russia sanctions as a top concern amid iterative updates.
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Stacey Bowers, who has served as the Director of the Office of the Advocate for Small Business Capital Formation, will depart the agency effective October 17, 2025. She has served as Director…
Why this matters
This is an informational news update about the departure of the Director of the Office of the Advocate for Small Business Capital Formation at the SEC. It is not an urgent regulatory change, but rather a personnel update that may be of interest to firms across the financial services industry.