CMI 27/2018 Controls and Disclosures to be Implemented by Licensed Securities-Based Crowdfunding Operators
This circular applies to licensed securities-based crowdfunding (SCF) operators. It sets out the measures SCF operators should put in place to assess issuers, manage defaults or cessations, and disclose interest and default rates.
MAS’s circular CMI 27/2018 imposes detailed **controls and disclosure standards** on licensed securities-based crowdfunding (SCF) operators, covering issuer due diligence, default/cessation management, interest and default rate reporting, and governance of auto-allocation tools. These expectations materially raise conduct, operational and disclosure obligations for SCF platforms and will drive changes to policies, investor communications, systems and governance frameworks.
Key dates
- 23 August 2018
- – Initial version of CMI 27/2018 “Controls and Disclosures to be Implemented by Licensed Securities-Based Crowdfunding Operators” published by MAS
- 08 October 2018
- – MAS publishes FAQs on Lending-based Crowdfunding, clarifying licensing and prospectus requirements and interacting with SCF-related guidance
- 05 March 2021
- – Updated version of CMI 27/2018 and Annex A / A1 / A2 for issuer default notification uploaded, refining default reporting and controls expected of SCF operators
- 21 January 2025
- – Revision of Guidelines on Criteria for the Grant of a Capital Markets Services Licence (SFA 04-G01), which interact with licensing expectations for SCF operators
- 14 July 2026
- – Last revised date of circular CMI 27/2018, signalling the most recent MAS expectations on controls and disclosures for licensed SCF operators
Suggested considerations
- Review existing issuer due diligence policies and procedures and update them to align with MAS’s expectations on structured checks, documentation, and investor disclosure of due diligence scope for all SCF offers.
- Implement a formal policy prohibiting the use of new loans to repay existing overdue loans, except where legitimate reasons exist; define those reasons, approval thresholds and documentation requirements for exceptions.
- Enhance lending workflows to ensure that, when new loans are extended to borrowers with outstanding loans, the platform system automatically collates and presents total outstanding exposure and the rationale for the new loan to investors in pre-investment disclosures.
- Develop and approve a detailed issuer default management framework that defines escalation triggers, recovery options, decision criteria, investor communication templates, and record-keeping requirements.
- Update investor terms and conditions and consent mechanisms so that investors explicitly agree to any potential recovery-related costs, with clear fee schedules and scenarios disclosed before costs are incurred.
What changed
- - Licensed SCF operators must implement structured due diligence checks on issuers, including clear policies on information to be obtained, risk assessment criteria and documentation standards, and...
- Lending-based SCF operators are generally prohibited from allowing a borrower to take up a new loan to repay an existing overdue loan, unless there are legitimate, documented reasons to extend a new...
- Where a lending-based SCF operator does extend a new loan to a borrower with outstanding loans, it must disclose the borrower’s total outstanding loans and the reasons for extending the new loan so...
- SCF operators must establish formal policies and procedures for issuer default management, documenting circumstances under which the operator will pursue various recovery options (e.g.
- Operators must disclose to investors the different recovery options and associated costs and must seek and obtain investors’ consent before incurring any recovery-related costs that will be borne by...
Compliance impact
Non-compliance with CMI 27/2018 can result in supervisory intervention, licence conditions, enforcement action and reputational damage, particularly where investor losses arise from poor due diligence, weak default management or misleading disclosures. Given MAS’s focus on retail and SME investor protection in crowdfunding, failures in these areas may be treated as serious conduct breaches and could jeopardise the SCF operator’s CMS licence and future regulatory approvals.
References
- [1] ronaldjjwong.com/2018/10/24/mas-circular-controls-disclos... third-party
- [2] singaporefintech.org/news/controls-and-disclosures-to-be-... third-party
- [3] nas.gov.sg/archivesonline/data/pdfdoc/20160608004/Press%2... third-party
- [4] caas.gov.sg/docs/default-source/docs---legal/air-navigati... third-party
- [5] bakermckenzie.com/-/media/files/insight/publications/2015... third-party
- [6] sso.agc.gov.sg/SL/SFA2001-RG13?DocDate=20181005&ViewType=... third-party
- [7] conventuslaw.com/report/mas-clarifies-crowdfunding-access... third-party
- [8] mas.gov.sg/-/media/compliance-toolkit-for-approvals-notif...
AI-generated analysis. May contain errors or omissions — verify with the original MAS source before acting. Full disclaimer.